> On Jul 24, 2020, at 6:07 AM, Kostas Michalopoulos via fpc-devel
> wrote:
>
> There should be at least support for operators. I have a custom
> dynamic array object type (i use objects instead of classes to avoid
> unnecessary heap allocations) which would benefit a lot from such
> support. I
There should be at least support for operators. I have a custom
dynamic array object type (i use objects instead of classes to avoid
unnecessary heap allocations) which would benefit a lot from such
support. I worked around not having management operators by putting
the data fields and core functio
> On Jul 23, 2020, at 7:32 AM, Kostas Michalopoulos via fpc-devel
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd also like to repeat that question since i was just trying to use
> management operators for a generic object type (not class, not record)
> that i want it to automatically initialize/shutdown itself (ri
Hi,
I'd also like to repeat that question since i was just trying to use
management operators for a generic object type (not class, not record)
that i want it to automatically initialize/shutdown itself (right now
i'm doing it manually but i'd prefer it if the compiler would do that
for me) and fo
Checking in on old bug report for "advanced objects" which was marked as
acknowledged on the tracker. Was there ever any discussion of this and
possibility of it being applied? I don't think it caused any controversy so I
was hoping to get to use it some time soon. :)
https://bugs.freepascal.or
