omputer
language benchmark game (with the stress on "game"), where you have at least
both
> FPC and GCC results.
Yup, the FPC factor is 2x-10x slower.
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=fpascal&lang2=gpp&box=1
LLVM that is currently
what something like LLVM
requires.
That's what I meant. Abstraction on higher level.
>
http://www.linux-kongress.org/2009/slides/compiler_survey_felix_von_leitner.pdf
Btw how does FPC or Delphi fare in comparison to LLVM, GCC, VC++?
Matej Spiller-Muys
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
ld
support LLVM efforts to create more pluggable backends.
Matej Spiller-Muys
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Samuel Crow wrote:
>
>
> > > There are classes to create any type documented at
> > http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#Type . As of the current
>
