Re: [fpc-devel] Closures/anonymous functions update

2019-05-18 Thread Blaise Thorn
Saturday, May 18, 2019 8:32 PM +03:00 from Ryan Joseph : > After 2 months now I’ve not been able to get the required sources to help > finish the closures branch. > The author Blaise did manage to contact me once but then went silent so I > don’t know what happened. Only yesterday, I have finis

Re: [fpc-devel] Closures repo

2019-03-21 Thread Blaise Thorn
Thursday, March 21, 2019 11:48 PM +03:00 from Ryan Joseph : > Then maybe he’ll hear this and respond. I just did. > I’m happy to write tests I will privately email you the details next week. (FTR, since I asked for help with writing tests on this list, you are the second one who volunteered in

Re: [fpc-devel] Closures repo

2019-03-21 Thread Blaise Thorn
> do we even have contact with the author anymore? FTR, the author automatically monitors this list for the keyword "closures". > From what I can tell most the work is already done IIRC, the last publicly available version lacks lifetime management support amongst other crucial stuff. FTR, the

Re: [fpc-devel] Closures / anonymous methods

2017-07-20 Thread Blaise Thorn
There has been some feature-level progress; in particular, capturing across arbitrary level of nested and nameless routines is now supported, along with proper lifetime management. Sven has read-write access to the source. No other features are planned by me before the merge. I am currently hung

[fpc-devel] Re: Regarding the Free Pascal closure branch

2013-03-03 Thread Blaise Thorn
On 29.01.2013 13:21, Sven Barth wrote: Am 29.01.2013 07:34, schrieb Blaise Thorn: On 16.12.2012 20:52, Sven Barth wrote: out of curiosity I have taken a look at your closure branch. Can it be that you forgot to commit the pnameless unit? I did not actually forget, just got distracted

[fpc-devel] Re: Closures -- Unrelated fixes

2012-02-02 Thread Blaise Thorn
On 02.02.2012 1:46, Blaise Thorn wrote: For know, I am here for a different request: I reckon that small fixes, especially those not directly related to closures, ought to be submitted separately. Or I could create something like http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/blaise/misc and

[fpc-devel] Re: Closures -- Unrelated fixes

2012-02-01 Thread Blaise Thorn
On 15.01.2012 19:26, Blaise Thorn wrote: I have implemented the support for the Delphi-compatible non-generic closures. OK, I have started committing into http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/blaise/closures (Be warned, though: I have not even finished with the work I have already done

Re: [fpc-devel] Closures

2012-01-16 Thread Blaise Thorn
On 16.01.2012 16:05, Sven Barth wrote: How firm are you with the implementation of generics inside the compiler? Totally blank. Since you are the person who has been working on that area most recently, I would actually appreciate if you could compile a document (on the wiki?) outlining the i

[fpc-devel] Closures

2012-01-15 Thread Blaise Thorn
Hello. I have implemented the support for the Delphi-compatible non-generic closures. Gradually, I plan to extend that support with: * generic closures (I am not sure, though, how much current generics are expected to be compatible with Delphi); * Delphi-incompatible extensions (simple namele