That sounds like a good idea. Let me see what I can do.
Kit
On 26/04/2025 23:19, Pierre Muller via fpc-devel wrote:
You can do that if you want,
maybe it would also be better to avoid all benchmark results writing
in this conformance configuration as there is not enough averaging,
and because
You can do that if you want,
maybe it would also be better to avoid all benchmark results writing
in this conformance configuration as there is not enough averaging,
and because in many cases the time interval is too short to get any value.
Pierre
Le 26/04/2025 à 23:50, J. Gareth Moreton via f
If it's okay, can I rename the define from "IN_TESTS" to "CONFORMANCE"
or similar? Technically, the code in "bcase" and "bfloatfunc" are still
tests, but by default are benchmarking tests evaluating performace
rather than conformance tests verifying that the compiler has produced
correct code.
Le 26/04/2025 à 01:07, J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel a écrit :
Hi everyone,
I'm curious behind the continuous failure of tests/test/tset6.pp - is it
a feature that hasn't been implemented yet or a parser problem?
Sets with more than 256 elements has never been implemented into the
compi
