Let me also share the results of tests for method pointers with different
default values. The example is a bit convoluted, but it shows all possible
combinations. It turns out that any component event definition always overrides
the default values from the class.
program Project1;
type
TT
Martin Frb via fpc-devel schrieb am Di.,
22. Okt. 2024, 23:28:
> Is the below meant to be allowed?
> It compiles, it also compiles if you have no default in the base, but a
> default in the sub class.
>
> type
>TFoo = class
> procedure Bar (const Item: String; AnObject: TObject = nil); v
Is the below meant to be allowed?
It compiles, it also compiles if you have no default in the base, but a
default in the sub class.
type
TFoo = class
procedure Bar (const Item: String; AnObject: TObject = nil); virtual;
end;
TFoo2 = class(TFoo)
procedure Bar (const Item: String; A
