On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:02:25 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel
wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2023, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-devel wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 14:10:28 +0100
> > Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
> >
> >> [...]
> >> > I can't remember the proverb that Florian used, but
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-devel wrote:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 14:10:28 +0100
Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
[...]
> I can't remember the proverb that Florian used, but it essentially
> boils down to very small changes, individually not amounting to
> much, but which accumula
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 14:10:28 +0100
Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
>[...]
> > I can't remember the proverb that Florian used, but it essentially
> > boils down to very small changes, individually not amounting to
> > much, but which accumulate into a noticable difference when in
> > large numbers.
On 01/03/2023 14:22, J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel wrote:
On 01/03/2023 13:11, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
Hence testing back to 3.2.3 ( unfortunately 3.2.2 has a bug that
matters in this code)
Also, I didn't expect any huge diffs, just wanted to see if anything
can be noted at all. (a
On 01/03/2023 13:10, Sven Barth wrote:
It's a German proverb: "Mühsam ernährt sich das Eichhörnchen"
Regards,
Sven
Thanks Sven!
Kit
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc
On 01/03/2023 13:11, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
Hence testing back to 3.2.3 ( unfortunately 3.2.2 has a bug that
matters in this code)
Also, I didn't expect any huge diffs, just wanted to see if anything
can be noted at all. (and if lucky, in that test I run)
I did a test on a more lim
On 01/03/2023 12:25, J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel wrote:
My peephole optimisations mostly save only a handful of cycles each
time which probably won't add up to much for a relatively short test.
The most major optimisation I can think of, although I'm not quite
sure when it was merged, is t
J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel schrieb am
Mi., 1. März 2023, 12:25:
> My peephole optimisations mostly save only a handful of cycles each time
> which probably won't add up to much for a relatively short test. The
> most major optimisation I can think of, although I'm not quite sure when
> it w
On 01/03/2023 11:55, Adriaan van Os via fpc-devel wrote:
That may have been "-Performance Matters- by Emery Berger". By I find
it a nonsense video.
Only that last year, I had some code where it happened to me. Some code
(that had no change in itself, other than a routine above it (which was
On 01/03/2023 11:47, Bart via fpc-devel wrote:
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 11:33 AM Martin Frb via fpc-devel
wrote:
So for a while now fpc 3.3.1 receives new optimizations => which is
great / big fan of it.
And hence I thought, lets see how much of an impact they have. And in my
test, they had non
My peephole optimisations mostly save only a handful of cycles each time
which probably won't add up to much for a relatively short test. The
most major optimisation I can think of, although I'm not quite sure when
it was merged, is the method of replacing divisions by a constant with
an equiv
Bart via fpc-devel wrote:
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 11:33 AM Martin Frb via fpc-devel
wrote:
So for a while now fpc 3.3.1 receives new optimizations => which is
great / big fan of it.
And hence I thought, lets see how much of an impact they have. And in my
test, they had none :(
Optimizations
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 11:33 AM Martin Frb via fpc-devel
wrote:
> So for a while now fpc 3.3.1 receives new optimizations => which is
> great / big fan of it.
>
> And hence I thought, lets see how much of an impact they have. And in my
> test, they had none :(
Optimizations beyond O2 (or even O1
So for a while now fpc 3.3.1 receives new optimizations => which is
great / big fan of it.
And hence I thought, lets see how much of an impact they have. And in my
test, they had none :(
Wondering if any one else has measured them?
My tests:
Win-10 64 bit
3.3.1 905c485ff413cd48f98891e2075c81
14 matches
Mail list logo
