On 16/02/2022 21:21, Dmitry Boyarintsev via fpc-devel wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 3:17 PM Martin Frb via fpc-devel
mailto:fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>>
wrote:
Anything similar on M1?
should it be ARM64 calling convention?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calling_convention#ARM_(A64)
On 16/02/2022 21:21, Dmitry Boyarintsev via fpc-devel wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 3:17 PM Martin Frb via fpc-devel
wrote:
Anything similar on M1?
should it be ARM64 calling convention?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calling_convention#ARM_(A64)
Possible. I have a bit of disassembly,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 3:17 PM Martin Frb via fpc-devel <
fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> Anything similar on M1?
>
should it be ARM64 calling convention?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calling_convention#ARM_(A64)
___
fpc-devel maillist - fp
Trying to get the IDE lldb based debugger to work on M1
But I don't have M1 myself, so ...
When
procedure fpc_Raiseexception (Obj : TObject; AnAddr : CodePointer;
AFrame : Pointer); compilerproc;
is entered, the IDE tries to get the arguments. In normal user installs
this code has no d
