Hi,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, Thorsten Otto via fpc-devel wrote:
> > but going with this would probably mean giving up TOS support.
>
> Yes, that 8.3 restriction might be the worst that was ever made. But
> even unices of that time allowed only 14 character long filenames.
It is also the main reason w
On Montag, 7. Februar 2022 14:34:12 CET Karoly Balogh wrote:
> but going with this would probably mean
> giving up TOS support.
Yes, that 8.3 restriction might be the worst that was ever made. But even
unices of that time allowed only 14 character long filenames.
I think you should not care abou
Hi,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, Karoly Balogh via fpc-devel wrote:
> Not under mind, but going with this would probably mean
> giving up TOS support.
*Not under MINT, I mean, sorry for the typo.
Charlie
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.or
Hi,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, Thorsten Otto via fpc-devel wrote:
> > It's just that you need to provide it with the correctly compiled units
>
> Yes, i see. But that requires some manual fiddling with the library
> directories, and you need both 68000 and 68020 versions somehow.
>
> How do the Amiga fo
On Montag, 7. Februar 2022 14:09:00 CET Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
> It's just that you need to provide it with the correctly compiled units
Yes, i see. But that requires some manual fiddling with the library
directories, and you need both 68000 and 68020 versions somehow.
How do the Amiga
Thorsten Otto via fpc-devel schrieb am
Mo., 7. Feb. 2022, 13:00:
> In the long term, it would be nice to have some automatic selection of the
> correct libraries. Otherwise it will not be possible to produce 68k
> binaries with a compiler that was compiled for 68020, since that will still
> pull
On Montag, 7. Februar 2022 13:39:49 CET Karoly Balogh wrote:
> Is the compiler binary itself a 68020 or a 68000 binary?
All i changed was using
make zipinstall OS_TARGET=atari CPU_TARGET=m68k 'CROSSOPT=-Cp68020 '
so i think that should be a 68020 binary?__
Hi,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, Thorsten Otto via fpc-devel wrote:
> > On Montag, 7. Februar 2022 10:31:01 CET Thorsten Otto via fpc-devel wrote:
>
> > Nice, that's it. Compiling everything for 68020, and it works.
>
> Hm, or maybe not. A few hours later, installing a freshly compiled
> version, i get th
On Montag, 7. Februar 2022 10:31:01 CET Thorsten Otto via fpc-devel wrote:
> Nice, that's it. Compiling everything for 68020, and it works.
Hm, or maybe not. A few hours later, installing a freshly compiled version, i
get that internal error again. Damn. Must be some other kind of randomness
inv
On Montag, 7. Februar 2022 10:31:01 CET Thorsten Otto via fpc-devel wrote:
> because the default has changed only recently.
That reminds me of another problem: if i'm not wrong, the compiler does not
use different sets of libraries depending on whether your are compiling for
68020 or not. That m
On Montag, 7. Februar 2022 09:46:50 CET Karoly Balogh wrote:
> Does it also happen, when you compile everything for the 68020?
> (-Cp68020)
Nice, that's it. Compiling everything for 68020, and it works. Thats strange.
But that also explains why it worked a few days ago, because the default has
c
Hi,
On Sun, 6 Feb 2022, Thorsten Otto via fpc-devel wrote:
> > - Running the same binaries in SingleTOS, they both give me "Internal
> > error 2004121202'. Then they both crash with a bus-error, too.
>
> That internal error is currently striking back. This happens both with
> my own compiled bina
On Sun, 6 Feb 2022, Pieter van Engen via fpc-devel wrote:
Hallo,
I installed an new MacMini with MACOS Monterey, installed XCCODE en XCODE tools,
then downloaded and installed: ppc-3.2.0.intel-macosx.dmg
started that, it finished with INSTALLATION COMPLETED!
But alas there was no FPC app a
13 matches
Mail list logo
