Well.
Maybe it's not that complex after all?
I mean, Linux target (not cross-compiling) builds fine. It's Linux->Win64 build
fails with those errors.
That regards https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=39140 , of course.
-- Regards,
Denis Golovan
___
Well, I've been trying to work it out, but this bug I'll have to
delegate to someone else to fix until I get a better idea of how it all
fits together.
Gareth aka. Kit
On 04/07/2021 12:06, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
Am 04.07.2021 um 12:59 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton:
Okay, okay. Not too h
Am 04.07.2021 um 12:59 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton:
Okay, okay. Not too harsh, please.
Better to stop the intention of modifying defs before you can get a
taste for them. :P
I feel I don't yet know enough about defs and generics to properly fix
this bug, only that the defs used aren't getting
Okay, okay. Not too harsh, please.
I feel I don't yet know enough about defs and generics to properly fix
this bug, only that the defs used aren't getting written out as debug
information because of the df_generic flag being present.
In the attached .s file, you can search for the reference t
Am 03.07.2021 um 15:01 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel:
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to fix i38827, and am trying a few things. One thing I've
noticed is that some specializations have both the df_generic and
df_specialization flags set, and the def missing from the debug
information that
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=39140Sorry, I forgot to send my bug13:33, 4 июля 2021 г., "denisgolovan via fpc-devel" :Sure. See attachment the bug I've created12:55, 4 июля 2021 г., "J. Gareth Moreton" :I just double-checked and my patch does fix the code exampl
Sure. See attachment the bug I've created12:55, 4 июля 2021 г., "J. Gareth Moreton" :I just double-checked and my patch does fix the code example, at least for me, but there might be more at play. Do you have a Windows code example that still fails that you're testing it against?Gareth aka. KitOn
I just double-checked and my patch does fix the code example, at least
for me, but there might be more at play. Do you have a Windows code
example that still fails that you're testing it against?
Gareth aka. Kit
On 04/07/2021 10:19, denisgolovan wrote:
I've posted a patch in the previous bug
> I've posted a patch in the previous bug report, but I'll be the first to
> admit that it's a little hacky. Given the linker errors in #39140 are
> similar to those in #38827, does it fix those too?
Nope, unfortunately it does not.
-- Regards,
Denis Golovan
__
I've posted a patch in the previous bug report, but I'll be the first to
admit that it's a little hacky. Given the linker errors in #39140 are
similar to those in #38827, does it fix those too?
Gareth aka. Kit
On 04/07/2021 10:07, denisgolovan wrote:
Thanks, Gareth.
I've created another iss
Thanks, Gareth.
I've created another issue, possibly related -
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=39140
Sven, could you take a look?
-- Regards,
Denis Golovan
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/
11 matches
Mail list logo