Op 2020-10-18 om 23:03 schreef Jonas Maebe via fpc-devel:
//>>>/I’ve been able to create a cross compiler using the guidance and some />>>/additional information. But I’ve been unable to create the proper FPC />>>/startup code (prt0.as) needed. />>>//>>>/Any help would be appreciated. />>/I belie
Hi everyone,
So I've been studying the disassembler dumps of the RTL for some new
possible optimisations, and I've found a potential one that's a little
trickier than normal:
...
# Peephole Optimization: MovxMov2Movx
movslq %eax,%rbx
jmp .Lj83
.p2align 4,,10
.p2align 3
.
Hi everyone,
Being on a working Intel laptop full-time again, I've gone back to
looking at the Peephole Optimizer like I always used to do. One thing
I've been focusing on is an attempt to reduce the number of passes of
the Peephole Optimizer, since a single pass amounts to stepping through
e
Gareth,
I deleted it, you did right to mark it as spam.
Michael.
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020, J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel wrote:
Hi everyone,
I just closed a bug report with a comment that it was 'spam'. Would you
agree? https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=37957
Is there a specific way s
Well, it looks like it got deleted completely! (It was a weird
advertisement for a security architect or something... someone needs to
tell their advertiser that bug trackers aren't the place to get your
name out!)
Gareth aka. Kit
On 19/10/2020 10:17, J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel wrote:
H
Hi everyone,
I just closed a bug report with a comment that it was 'spam'. Would you
agree? https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=37957
Is there a specific way such 'bugs' should be handled?
Gareth aka. Kit
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://ww
