Often a fluent API has some grammar described via different interfaces that are
implemented by either one (in this case you always return Self) or different
classes.
It is not just to chain methods together that you could also write like you did.
> On 22 August 2017 at 13:15 Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Kazantsev Alexey via fpc-devel wrote:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:15:24 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Call me old-fashioned, but I much prefer
With StdIO::stdOutPrinter() do
begin
out("Helllo World ");
out(42);
out("");
hex();
out(
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:15:24 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> Call me old-fashioned, but I much prefer
>
>With StdIO::stdOutPrinter() do
> begin
> out("Helllo World ");
> out(42);
> out("");
> hex();
> out(42);
> line();
> end;
>
> I see no p
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
Call me old-fashioned, but I much prefer
With StdIO::stdOutPrinter() do
begin
out("Helllo World ");
out(42);
out("");
hex();
out(42);
line();
end;
I see no point or gain in the "fluent" code.
First C++
Am 22.08.2017 13:15 schrieb "Michael Van Canneyt" :
>
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Thaddy de Koning wrote:
>
>>> On 21.08.2017 13:22, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Benito van der Zander wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This pattern is not inherently efficient.
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Thaddy de Koning wrote:
On 21.08.2017 13:22, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Benito van der Zander wrote:
Hi,
This pattern is not inherently efficient. Why should it be ?
It is not efficient, because of the pointless instruction!
I am not speaki
> On 21.08.2017 13:22, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Benito van der Zander wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
This pattern is not inherently efficient. Why should it be ?
>>>
>>>
>>> It is not efficient, because of the pointless instruction!
>>
>> I am not speaking of the current
