Hi, I noted that Pierre is updating the OpenBSD port.
Does anyone knows where can I find a bootstraping compiler for this platform?.
Leonardo M. Ramé
http://leonardorame.blogspot.com___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://list
On 10/04/2011 01:02 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
I wonder when Lazarus will be able to follow and use this string type
for the complete library.
The LCL will use one unique encoding, most probably UTF-8 as the only
losless Unicode representation. This means that strings with different
e
Michael Schnell schrieb:
On 10/04/2011 10:59 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Yes. Each string will have a codepage identifier associated with it.
if, during an assign operation, a difference exists, a conversion will
occur.
(there are of course some exceptions)
GREAT !
Not really :-(
I wo
On 10/04/2011 11:59 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
The earliest point is when the next big release after 2.6 is released
(note: I don't mean 2.6.x here, more a 2.8). As 2.6 is currently
prepared you can estimate how long that will take.
I see. ;-)
Unfortunately Delphi is way ahead on this behalf, b
Am 04.10.2011 11:19, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 10/04/2011 10:59 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Yes. Each string will have a codepage identifier associated with it.
if, during an assign operation, a difference exists, a conversion will
occur.
(there are of course some exceptions)
GREAT !
I
On 10/04/2011 10:59 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Yes. Each string will have a codepage identifier associated with it.
if, during an assign operation, a difference exists, a conversion will
occur.
(there are of course some exceptions)
GREAT !
I wonder when Lazarus will be able to follow an
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 10/03/2011 11:41 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Currently, hard work is being put in the unicode string and codepage string
routines in the RTL.
Do I understand correctly that this is the "New String" string handling (to
be optionally,
On 10/03/2011 11:41 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Currently, hard work is being put in the unicode string and codepage
string
routines in the RTL.
Do I understand correctly that this is the "New String" string handling
(to be optionally, by default or exclusively used) ?
Do I und
> -Message d'origine-
> De : fpc-devel-boun...@lists.freepascal.org [mailto:fpc-devel-
> boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de Joost van der Sluis
> Envoyé : lundi 3 octobre 2011 16:24
> À : FPC developers' list
> Objet : Re: [fpc-devel] New Windows gdb-binary
>
> On Sat, 2011-10-0
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 08:48, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
There is, again, a continuum between careful development and stangation.
While acknowledging great work that FPC team has done on the former,
I'd venture to say that is came uncomfortably clo
> > Use this new macro:
> >
> > $ cvs diff -u -p gdbtypes.h
> > Index: gdbtypes.h
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbtypes.h,v
> > retrieving revision 1.153
> > diff -u -p -r1.153 gdbtypes.h
> > --- gdbtypes.h 5 Jul 2011 13:36
11 matches
Mail list logo
