Re: [fpc-devel] Can't build FPC what can be a reason?

2011-04-25 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 22 Apr 2011, at 07:02, Paul Ishenin wrote: > 20.04.2011 16:39, Jonas Maebe wrote: > >> It's a bug in the compiler that it accepts that set constant declaration. >> Sets are only allowed to contain values up to ord(255). Anything more is not >> supported, although things may work at the code

Re: [fpc-devel] intptr_t and Linux

2011-04-25 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, ik said: > > and ptrint, intptr and (c)intptr_t is a bit too much without very good > > reasons. > > > > So, what do you need it for, and why can't you use simply ptrint? > > > > I bind C code, and looked for it. > And I used PtrInt instead but was interested in understand