On Tue, March 23, 2010 21:13, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
> W dniu 2010-03-23 20:04, dmitry boyarintsev pisze:
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Dariusz Mazur
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Delphi set ii to 9, FPC set 0 (io is equal 2)
>>> is this bug?
>>>
>> Don't assume the value of ii (since it's invalid), if io<>
Dariusz Mazur schrieb:
> W dniu 2010-03-23 20:04, dmitry boyarintsev pisze:
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
>>
>>> Delphi set ii to 9, FPC set 0 (io is equal 2)
>>> is this bug?
>>>
>> Don't assume the value of ii (since it's invalid), if io<> 0
>>
>>
>
> I
W dniu 2010-03-23 20:04, dmitry boyarintsev pisze:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
Delphi set ii to 9, FPC set 0 (io is equal 2)
is this bug?
Don't assume the value of ii (since it's invalid), if io<> 0
I don't ask about it. Only if this difference is a
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
> Delphi set ii to 9, FPC set 0 (io is equal 2)
> is this bug?
Don't assume the value of ii (since it's invalid), if io <> 0
thanks,
dmitry
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Hi
I found different behavior of VAL function under Delphi and FPC
var
i,io : integer
begin
val('9 ',ii,io);
writeln(ii);
writeln(io);
end;
Delphi set ii to 9, FPC set 0 (io is equal 2)
is this bug?
--
Darek
___
fpc-devel maillist -
It did work.
Thanks a lot !
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On 03/23/2010 04:16 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> What happens at this point is that you are mixing two different FPC
> installations. If you want to install in /usr instead of in
> /usr/local, use "make install INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr"
That is what I did assume.
But of course I needed to install FPC 2.4
On 23 Mar 2010, at 16:07, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 03/23/2010 04:01 PM, Paul Ishenin wrote:
23.03.2010 21:26, Michael Schnell wrote:
But where id fpc's "make install" move the correct executable ?
If no other options are passed then to /usr/local/lib/fpc
I think that is the problem - you n
On 03/23/2010 04:01 PM, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> 23.03.2010 21:26, Michael Schnell wrote:
>> But where id fpc's "make install" move the correct executable ?
> If no other options are passed then to /usr/local/lib/fpc
>
> I think that is the problem - you need to replace symlink and to
> change fpc.cfg
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Marco van de Voort het geskryf:
For the same reason why the Unix rtl is not a Windows emulation. We are
writing a multiplatform compiler and rtl, not an emulation.
If only that was true... I can highlight a few places where Windows
emulation is
Marco van de Voort het geskryf:
>
> For the same reason why the Unix rtl is not a Windows emulation. We are
> writing a multiplatform compiler and rtl, not an emulation.
If only that was true... I can highlight a few places where Windows
emulation is used rather that pure multi-platform implement
11 matches
Mail list logo