On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Adriaan van Os wrote:
> Is it useful to file bugs for -Amacho or is the feature still in
> experimental state ?
It is useful.
thanks,
dmitry
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepas
Is it useful to file bugs for -Amacho or is the feature still in experimental
state ?
Regards,
Adriaan van Os
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> Yes, but it is not the full documentation.
yep. I guess is the source for the the information give at wikipedia :)
Anyway, following Flávio's suggestion:
https://forums.embarcadero.com/thread.jspa?threadID=34211&stqc=true
thanks,
dmitry
___
On 12 Mar 2010, at 19:50, dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
> Quite official, i guess:
> http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/en/Fastcall,_fastcall
Yes, but it is not the full documentation.
Jonas
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>> Are they that cheap to
>> hold back such kind of information?
>
> I'm not aware of them being cheap in this or in other ways.
Quite official, i guess:
http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/en/Fastcall,_fastcall
thanks,
dmitry
___
On 12 Mar 2010, at 18:25, Flávio Etrusco wrote:
> Can't we ask someone from Borland/Embarcadero?
That's indeed a good idea, I don't think anyone has already done that.
> Are they that cheap to
> hold back such kind of information?
I'm not aware of them being cheap in this or in other ways.
J
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 12 Mar 2010, at 17:59, Paul Ishenin wrote:
>
>> 12.03.2010 23:51, Paul Ishenin wrote:
>>>
>>> If something more is required please let me know and I will search.
>> Also found the next document with more info:
>> http://www.agner.org/opti
On 12 Mar 2010, at 17:59, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> 12.03.2010 23:51, Paul Ishenin wrote:
>>
>> If something more is required please let me know and I will search.
> Also found the next document with more info:
> http://www.agner.org/optimize/calling_conventions.pdf
It describes what we implement
12.03.2010 23:51, Paul Ishenin wrote:
If something more is required please let me know and I will search.
Also found the next document with more info:
http://www.agner.org/optimize/calling_conventions.pdf
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
___
fpc-devel
On 12 Mar 2010, at 17:51, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> 12.03.2010 21:55, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>>
>> PS: one reason that this is not advancing is because FPC does not support it
>> correctly either, and I don't want to add support for a broken
>> implementation to GDB since then it has to be changed aga
12.03.2010 21:55, Jonas Maebe wrote:
PS: one reason that this is not advancing is because FPC does not
support it correctly either, and I don't want to add support for a
broken implementation to GDB since then it has to be changed again
later anyway. I also don't know of any description of th
Sorry, sent to the wrong list (Flavio: please reply to the list
instead of to me personally)
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jonas Maebe
Date: Fri 12 Mar 2010 16:44:30 GMT+01:00
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
Subject: [fpc-pascal] Re: [fpc-devel] properties with getter
evaluation in gdb
On 12 Mar 2010, at 02:44, Paul Ishenin wrote:
1. gdb does not supports borland fastcall calling convention (delphi
calls it register though)
PS: one reason that this is not advancing is because FPC does not
support it correctly either, and I don't want to add support for a
broken impleme
On 12 Mar 2010, at 02:44, Paul Ishenin wrote:
I know at the moment we have the next problems which cause subj
don't work:
1. gdb does not supports borland fastcall calling convention (delphi
calls it register though)
2. fpc does not write debug info for properties with getters because
of
12.03.2010 15:11, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
You mean in the gdb info only, I hope ?
dwarf debug info.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On 12 Mar 2010, at 08:57, dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
afaik, -Xg is not support on Darwin at all. Technically it can be
supported for Dwarf debug only
It is supported with DWARF on Darwin.
Jonas
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Hello, FPC developers' list.
I know at the moment we have the next problems which cause subj don't work:
1. gdb does not supports borland fastcall calling convention (delphi calls it
register though)
2. fpc does not write debug info for properties wi
On 12 Mar 2010, at 04:01, Paul Ishenin wrote:
One possibility is to use -Xg by default. But hence the question -
whether -Xg works reliable for all platforms?
It does not work (and will never work, because the tool chain simply
does not support such functionality) for Stabs on Mac OS X. I
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> One possibility is to use -Xg by default. But hence the question - whether
> -Xg works reliable for all platforms?
afaik, -Xg is not support on Darwin at all. Technically it can be
supported for Dwarf debug only.
thanks,
dmitry
_
19 matches
Mail list logo
