Re: [fpc-devel] Idea/question about a language (syntax) extension

2009-12-22 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > Flávio Etrusco schrieb: >>  But what's your >> opinion on extending it to standard procedures? > > I see no sense in doing so. > Do you mean this syntax or the feature at all? Do you know another way to solve or help the problem I propose

Re: [fpc-devel] 'cpstrnew' branch is available on GitHub

2009-12-22 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Hi, > > I added the 'cpstrnew' branch to the Git mirror repository on GitHub. I forgot to mention - for those new to Git and the Git mirror of FPC. If you think pulling in 4 branches will be a huge download, you will be pleasantly surprised. I just did a full clone (ful

[fpc-devel] 'cpstrnew' branch is available on GitHub

2009-12-22 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi, I added the 'cpstrnew' branch to the Git mirror repository on GitHub. http://github.com/graemeg/freepascal/tree/cpstrnew If you are using the Git repository, there is nothing new you need to do. The usual 'git pull' will automatically bring in the new branch details. After the pull you wil

Re: [fpc-devel] Idea/question about a language (syntax) extension

2009-12-22 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Flávio Etrusco schrieb: > But what's your > opinion on extending it to standard procedures? I see no sense in doing so. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] Idea/question about a language (syntax) extension

2009-12-22 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 22 Dec 2009, at 13:00, Flávio Etrusco wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Jonas Maebe > wrote: On 22 Dec 2009, at 06:27, Alexander Klenin wrote: I'd say rather something like CallSomething(Arg1:=10, Arg2:='Test') which is already sort-of-supported by Delphi for automation classes:

Re: [SPAM] [fpc-devel] FPC 2.5.x changelog?

2009-12-22 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 22 Dec 2009, at 12:59, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: Hi, I'm looking for the changelog of FPC, I want to know what new features and changes were added, but I couln't find it on the FPC's site. Where can I find it? There's only the svn log. Jonas__

Re: [fpc-devel] Idea/question about a language (syntax) extension

2009-12-22 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote: > > On 22 Dec 2009, at 06:27, Alexander Klenin wrote: > >> I'd say rather something like >> >> CallSomething(Arg1:=10, Arg2:='Test') >> >> which is already sort-of-supported by Delphi for automation classes: >> >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/ques

[fpc-devel] FPC 2.5.x changelog?

2009-12-22 Thread Leonardo M . Ramé
Hi, I'm looking for the changelog of FPC, I want to know what new features and changes were added, but I couln't find it on the FPC's site. Where can I find it? Leonardo M. Ramé http://leonardorame.blogspot.com ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@l

Re: [fpc-devel] Idea/question about a language (syntax) extension

2009-12-22 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Michael Schnell wrote: > Flávio Etrusco wrote: >> WhAny alternatives? > > Using properties. > > -Michael Err, I don't get it. How do I avoid the situation I mentioned with the "class/record fields" alternative using properties? Best regards, Flávio __

Re: [fpc-devel] Idea/question about a language (syntax) extension

2009-12-22 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 22 Dec 2009, at 06:27, Alexander Klenin wrote: I'd say rather something like CallSomething(Arg1:=10, Arg2:='Test') which is already sort-of-supported by Delphi for automation classes: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/885942/named-optional-parameters-in-delphi FPC also already supports

Re: [fpc-devel] Idea/question about a language (syntax) extension

2009-12-22 Thread Michael Schnell
Flávio Etrusco wrote: > WhAny alternatives? Using properties. -Michael ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel