Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
Suppose, the list items have a property "Owner" and the iterator calls
some method that says "Owner.Delete (self);" somewhere. How's the
compiler supposed to detect that?
It can't. In general, all references to the (iterator) list need to be
"const" at this time, but I
On Saturday 24 October 2009, Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
> I want to remove the avl_tree-related stuff from DOM unit. The
> reasons are:
If that's a CfV, I vote "yes".
Vinzent.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepasc
On Monday 26 October 2009, Micha Nelissen wrote:
> Vinzent Höfler wrote:
> > At first, "const function" would tell us that the function does not
> > change the object in any way, right?
>
> What is "the object"?
In that case, the list, of course.
> Usually there are 2 objects: the list (TList
>
Florian Klaempfl schrieb:
Sven Barth schrieb:
All in all I have the following goals for (my) future work on this:
* make a cppclass an implicit pointer
I don't like this idea because C++-classes aren't an implicit pointer
either.
At first I wanted to disagree with you... philosophing about
On 31 Oct 2009, at 01:14, peter green wrote:
1: is there a table anywhere of the size of extended on different
platforms?
No.
2: the mentions of m68k (which was dropped a while back afaict) and
very little else in the manual makes me suspect the manual in
general may be rather outdated.
