On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
> Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > >
> > > Under Linux the maximum file length is 255 character. Gnome's Nautilus
> > > allows that length. Any larger and Nautilus or a terminal command like
> > > 'cp' complains.
> > >
> > > FindFile / FindNext however
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Under Linux the maximum file length is 255 character. Gnome's Nautilus
allows that length. Any larger and Nautilus or a terminal command like
'cp' complains.
FindFile / FindNext however seems to have a 253 character limit! Why
the difference when the OS can suppor
On 14/03/2008, Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Under Linux the maximum file length is 255 character. Gnome's Nautilus
> allows that length. Any larger and Nautilus or a terminal command like
> 'cp' complains.
>
> FindFile / FindNext however seems to have a 253 character l
Hi,
Under Linux the maximum file length is 255 character. Gnome's Nautilus
allows that length. Any larger and Nautilus or a terminal command like
'cp' complains.
FindFile / FindNext however seems to have a 253 character limit! Why
the difference when the OS can support up to 255 characters?
Re
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Does the ARM ABI require that the stack is aligned to 8 byte boundaries?
Sorry, I don't know.
Regards, Bernd.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Micha Nelissen wrote:
Bernd Mueller wrote:
ok, it does not work. This is what I guessed. But I am in doubt about
your current fix:
asm
bic r0,sp,#7
ldrd r0,[r0]
end;
r0 is double word (8 byte) aligned now, but does it always point to a
valid memory location? IMHO something like t
Bernd Mueller wrote:
ok, it does not work. This is what I guessed. But I am in doubt about
your current fix:
asm
bic r0,sp,#7
ldrd r0,[r0]
end;
r0 is double word (8 byte) aligned now, but does it always point to a
valid memory location? IMHO something like that would be better:
Bernd Mueller schrieb:
> Bernd Mueller wrote:
>>
>> You chose ldrd r0, [sp] to force the SIGILL on ARMv4. According to the
>> docs the load address has to be double word (8 byte) aligned,
>> otherwise a Bus Error/Misaligned data access Error on ARMv5 would
>> occur. Is it save to use sp in your way
Bernd Mueller wrote:
You chose ldrd r0, [sp] to force the SIGILL on ARMv4. According to the
docs the load address has to be double word (8 byte) aligned, otherwise
a Bus Error/Misaligned data access Error on ARMv5 would occur. Is it
save to use sp in your way?
ok, it does not work. This is
