Re: [fpc-devel] confusion in FPC version numbers

2007-03-26 Thread Tomas Hajny
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Hi, > I am a bit confused with the FPC version numbers in SubVersion. > Obviously I just don't know or understand how the version numbers in > FPC work. I do know even numbers are stable and odd numbers unstable. > The version increments is still a mystery. ;-) Actually

Re: [fpc-devel] confusion in FPC version numbers

2007-03-26 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 27 mrt 2007, at 09:44, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Why has the /Fixes_2_2 branch got a version number 2.1.3? The name is very misleading. Why not 2.1.2 or 2.2.0? Even version numbers are reserved for releases (either internal/ external releases), i.e. they correspond to a single source tree

[fpc-devel] confusion in FPC version numbers

2007-03-26 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi, I am a bit confused with the FPC version numbers in SubVersion. Obviously I just don't know or understand how the version numbers in FPC work. I do know even numbers are stable and odd numbers unstable. The version increments is still a mystery. Why has the /Fixes_2_2 branch got a version nu

[fpc-devel] FPC Versus Laz - Seems Different or Configuration - Any Suggestions?

2007-03-26 Thread Jason P Sage
Hello All, I've just started REALLY getting into Lazarus - (trying) and I'm really impressed where it stands right now. I've been using straight FPC for a long time and have many units that work great with databases etc. In Lazarus - Whenever I try to create a class I made - I get the Project1

Re: [fpc-devel] Is there any logger in fpc?

2007-03-26 Thread Evgeniy Ivanov
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:40:24 +0400, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Op Mon, 26 Mar 2007, schreef Michael Van Canneyt: On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: > On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:03:26 +0400, Michael Van Canneyt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >On Mon, 26 Mar

Re: [fpc-devel] Is there any logger in fpc?

2007-03-26 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Mon, 26 Mar 2007, schreef Michael Van Canneyt: > > > On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:03:26 +0400, Michael Van Canneyt > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: > > > > > > >Hi! How may I do my log

Re: [fpc-devel] Is there any logger in fpc?

2007-03-26 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: > On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:03:26 +0400, Michael Van Canneyt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: > > > > >Hi! How may I do my logging for fpc package? There is not bad logger in the > > >JEDI-SDL, but is th

Re: [fpc-devel] Is there any logger in fpc?

2007-03-26 Thread Evgeniy Ivanov
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:03:26 +0400, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: Hi! How may I do my logging for fpc package? There is not bad logger in the JEDI-SDL, but is there any fpc native logger? Also sdlgraph will be use some headers

Re: [fpc-devel] Is there any logger in fpc?

2007-03-26 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: > Hi! How may I do my logging for fpc package? There is not bad logger in the > JEDI-SDL, but is there any fpc native logger? Also sdlgraph will be use some > headers from JEDI, so I don't see any reasons to not use sdl/logger.pas. There is the eventlo

[fpc-devel] Is there any logger in fpc?

2007-03-26 Thread Evgeniy Ivanov
Hi! How may I do my logging for fpc package? There is not bad logger in the JEDI-SDL, but is there any fpc native logger? Also sdlgraph will be use some headers from JEDI, so I don't see any reasons to not use sdl/logger.pas. -- Best regards E.I.

Re: [fpc-devel] MSEide+MSEgui and FPC 2.2

2007-03-26 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Monday 26 March 2007 14.39, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > Martin Schreiber schrieb: > > Hi, > > MSEide+MSEgui compiles and runs on Linux with FPC 2.1.1. > > It compiles on win32 but does not run. > > Mantis 8481 ("By copying an record with OLE string fields, the memory > > location of the *source* s

Re: [fpc-devel] MSEide+MSEgui and FPC 2.2

2007-03-26 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Martin Schreiber schrieb: > Hi, > MSEide+MSEgui compiles and runs on Linux with FPC 2.1.1. > It compiles on win32 but does not run. > Mantis 8481 ("By copying an record with OLE string fields, the memory > location > of the *source* string is changed.") is a show stopper for MSEgui, I can not >

[fpc-devel] MSEide+MSEgui and FPC 2.2

2007-03-26 Thread Martin Schreiber
Hi, MSEide+MSEgui compiles and runs on Linux with FPC 2.1.1. It compiles on win32 but does not run. Mantis 8481 ("By copying an record with OLE string fields, the memory location of the *source* string is changed.") is a show stopper for MSEgui, I can not do more debugging until the problem is so

Re: [fpc-devel] overflow checking

2007-03-26 Thread Vincent Snijders
Vincent Snijders schreef: Hi, I am trying to compile and run some parts of Lazarus (lcl\interfaces\win32) with -Criot. I get some overflow errors I don't understand. I tried to understand the logic behind the generated assembler and made a small test program, which doesn't give an overflow e