Re: [fpc-devel] Problems with viewcvs

2006-09-28 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 9/28/06, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Fixed. Uau! that must be a record =) -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] Problems with viewcvs

2006-09-28 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb: Hello, I tryed accessing the viewcvs page for free pascal: http://www.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/?root=fpc But it gives this error: An Exception Has Occurred Python Traceback Traceback (most recent call last): File "/srv/viewcvs/lib/viewcvs.py", l

[fpc-devel] Problems with viewcvs

2006-09-28 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
Hello, I tryed accessing the viewcvs page for free pascal: http://www.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/?root=fpc But it gives this error: An Exception Has Occurred Python Traceback Traceback (most recent call last): File "/srv/viewcvs/lib/viewcvs.py", line 3355, in main request.run_viewc

Re: [fpc-devel] Suggestion for change: Overly strict check

2006-09-28 Thread Micha Nelissen
Christian Iversen wrote: > rare, however - and you have to be careful anyway, because this restriction > is not consistent: > > var > wait: boolean; > > procedure tfoo.ReadStuff(buffer: tbuffer; wait: boolean); > begin > // In here, wait could refer either to the parameter, or the global va

Re: [fpc-devel] Suggestion for change: Overly strict check

2006-09-28 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Christian Iversen wrote: > > Hi all. > > I was hoping there could be a discussion of a certain feature in FPC, which > doesn't work very well for us. Ultimately, I would like to see it gone > completely. It's a very small extra-strong syntax check, appearantly > impleme

Re: [fpc-devel] Suggestion for change: Overly strict check

2006-09-28 Thread Vinzent Hoefler
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 20:50, ik wrote: > Let me give you an example of a real bug that allow attackers to gain > root access using X-server, and I hope you will understand why such > checking can be a good thing. It *can*. But as usual the pros and cons should be weighted properly. Alth