> Try adding this line to the top of your unit or program:
> {$LINKLIB gcc_s}
Why _s? Is FC4 breaking compat here?
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
> BTW, I am using Fedora4test3 which use gcc4.
Do you have the libgcc libraries installed?
It should be be something like this:
http://rpmfind.net//linux/RPM/fedora/devel/i386/libgcc-4.0.0-8.i386.html
- Jeff
___
fp
Jeff Pohlmeyer wrote:
So I delete the chmlib.so and the
compiler try to compile with chmlib.a
FPC tells the linker to look first in the current directory,
so instead of deleting chmlib.so, you can just do this:
% ln -s /usr/local/lib/libchm.a
in the directory of your pascal source.
Gr
> So I delete the chmlib.so and the
> compiler try to compile with chmlib.a
FPC tells the linker to look first in the current directory,
so instead of deleting chmlib.so, you can just do this:
% ln -s /usr/local/lib/libchm.a
in the directory of your pascal source.
> undefined reference to `__mo
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Linuxer Wang wrote:
Hi, all
I try to compile my program with chmlib.
There're chmlib.so and chmlib.a under /usr/lib. I find a wierd problem,
when I compile my program, the compiler uses chmlib.so, and the
compilation is successful.
But what I
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Linuxer Wang wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I try to compile my program with chmlib.
> There're chmlib.so and chmlib.a under /usr/lib. I find a wierd problem,
> when I compile my program, the compiler uses chmlib.so, and the
> compilation is successful.
> But what I want is too compi
Hi, all
I try to compile my program with chmlib.
There're chmlib.so and chmlib.a under /usr/lib. I find a wierd problem,
when I compile my program, the compiler uses chmlib.so, and the
compilation is successful.
But what I want is too compile it with chmlib.a so that the executable
will be indepen
Vinzent Hoefler said:
> Ok, first status on the matter:
>
> Tonight I've spent some time with the sources and my Win2K machine. For
> me it seems as the Makefile(.fpc)'s are not yet up to date for the
> go32v2 target (object files didn't get deleted on cleanall, some unit
> paths were missing, that
Just put a v2.1.1 basedos.zip (compiler & rtl only) snapshot which I just made
on win me, using supplied makes into ftp.freepascal.org .../snapshot/v21/. Used
.../snapshot/v21/source/ . Not tested much, but it works for hello world
program anyway...
Regards John
-Original Message-
From
I've never been able to make go32v2 make work properly under w2k/xp, and
neither has anyone else afaik - because of the well known bugs...Not worth
trying imho - best to use real dos.
Current make cycle (just compiler & rtl) & go32v2zip (whole release) works fine
under win9x - I use ME.
Bo
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
>
> Oh, yes. One question: Should I use the current fpc2.0.1 release from
> the CVS or would it be better to switch to the 2.1.x branch already to
> not get too far behind the current development? Just don't say
> "both". ;-)
Our policy is to work and develop patches in
Ok, first status on the matter:
Tonight I've spent some time with the sources and my Win2K machine. For
me it seems as the Makefile(.fpc)'s are not yet up to date for the
go32v2 target (object files didn't get deleted on cleanall, some unit
paths were missing, that sort of stuff) [FYI: I checke
12 matches
Mail list logo
