04-10-16 19.40, skrev Chess Player följande:
> If packed records are such a problem, don't use packed records. We're not
> programming for computers with 640kb of RAM.
"packed" is sometime used to make the binary representation of the record
more predictable, which you might need if you mix fpc
Marc Weustink wrote:
At 00:15 14-10-2004, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Marc Weustink wrote:
At 16:38 13-10-2004, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 12 okt 2004, at 22:12, Marc Weustink wrote:
M:> Is a sigbus catchable so that you can read the data and
continue as if nothing happened (or is that something at OS leve
If packed records are such a problem, don't use packed records. We're not
programming for computers with 640kb of RAM.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
___
On 16 Oct 2004, at 18:41, Olle Raab wrote:
Some time ago Florian did mention to add emulation of 80-bit Extended
typ,
to make it possible to create e. g. powerpc-intel-cross-compilers...
It was needed because Extended constant expressions is to be evaluated
during compile time.
Actually, I though
04-10-13 16.38, skrev Jonas Maebe följande:
> We also don't emulate the 80-bit
> extended type on processors which only have a 64-bit double precision
> fpu. We also don't emulate endianess. Portability has a lot of
> pitfalls.
Some time ago Florian did mention to add emulation of 80-bit Extended
On 13 Oct 2004, at 23:02, Marc Weustink wrote:
We also don't emulate endianess. Portability has a lot of pitfalls.
In a matter of fact, you do support endianness. As an enduser I don't
have to take care ot the phisical representation of an integer for
instance.
An integer and $FF is still a value
At 00:15 14-10-2004, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Marc Weustink wrote:
At 16:38 13-10-2004, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 12 okt 2004, at 22:12, Marc Weustink wrote:
M:> Is a sigbus catchable so that you can read the data and continue as
if nothing happened (or is that something at OS level)
That is normally
