Re: [fpc-devel]Registry bug

2003-11-28 Thread Marco van de Voort
> I found a bug in registry.pp file. > I use fpc 1.0.10 release version. So It's possible that this is already fixed. I fixed it in the 1.9.x branch. ___ fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

[fpc-devel]Registry bug

2003-11-28 Thread Tamas Konkoly
Hi, I found a bug in registry.pp file. I use fpc 1.0.10 release version. So It's possible that this is already fixed. Change this line from: TRegDataType = (rdUnknown, rdString, rdExpandString, rdInteger, rdBinary); to: TRegDataType = (rdUnknown, rdString, rdExpandString, rdBinary, rdInteger

Re: [fpc-devel]comment bug

2003-11-28 Thread Tamas Konkoly
I know. But either the compiler don't make error message in this, or make but with correct text, because it is not unambiguous for me. The error text is now: compiler switches aren't allowed in (* ... *) styled comments Darek Mazur wrote: > $ is begin of compilation directive like $IFDEF or $A-

Re: [fpc-devel]implicit calls to _addref / _release fail

2003-11-28 Thread Peter Vreman
> Which segfaults immediately because %eax contains the return value of > _addref (stdcall calling convention) which is 1 in this case. > > I don't really know where the problem is (ie, why the compiler generates > this code), however this keeps reference counted interfaces from working > at all.