On 14 December 2011 13:32, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Well, but let's not forget that the folks you explicitly list here are
> probably more on the side against the colocation than for it. At least
> of the one you named first I know that he is against the combined
> conf. And I think Richard is
On 4 June 2012 08:02, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Is the sql database for the elections impacted by this? If yes, is there
> a risk that some votes got lost?
Some bugs appear to have been lost, e.g.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677387
Richard.
On 1 March 2013 13:04, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> I didn't even know it existed...
I second that -- and I'm not sure how it's supposed to be used, or by
who... e.g. is it for use by anyone with a @gnome.org email address,
or can it be used by the unwashed masses as well?
Richard.
__
On 10 May 2013 15:55, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> I've never heard the word "gimp" used as a slur against handicapped
> people
If it helps, I've never heard the word used this way either. However,
my understanding of the common use of the word isn't any better
(warning; possibly NSFW):
https://www.g
On 24 March 2014 16:18, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> I am less interested in where the toggle lives[0] than who is storing
> the data, and what kind of data it is.
Right; 100% agreed. My original idea was to store one thing with the
distributor:
* The hashed IP (i.e. you can go from IP->id, but not
On 25 March 2014 22:41, Richard Stallman wrote:
> We might _store_ just a hash code, but I am pretty sure the messages
> contain the real IP address of the sender.
Sure, just as much as your IP is sent to the NTP server or the
google.com homepage.
> The feature should be useful, but it should op
On 3 April 2014 19:18, Richard Stallman wrote:
> That's true. Most distros do not recognize that this system is
> basically GNU; they give the credit for the GNU Project's work
> to Mr Torvalds, rather than to us.
By calling it Linux, I'm also not recognizing the work of the Apache
foundation. I
Hi, perhaps a little late to the party here but I thought I'd ask
anyway. One of the most frequent enhancements people suggest to
gnome-software is the ability to donate to both upstream applications,
and to independent developers. This is something I think we need to
address if we want random deve
On 21 May 2014 10:14, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Suggesting that we don't have GNOME's best interests at heart is
> just hurtful, and incorrect.
Agreed. I've never once been told by anyone at Red Hat to do something
that I didn't think was in the best interests of GNOME as a project.
Richard
__
On 21 May 2014 12:24, Emily Gonyer wrote:
> Sure, those of us who are not currently paid can speak up on mailing lists,
> but we're (mostly) roundly ignored.
I think this is a classic case of "code speaks" -- i.e. if you're
willing to spend the time writing the feature and maintaining the code
f
On 21 October 2014 11:54, Andrea Veri wrote:
> * Kat to draft a proposal for a privacy policy for review
Finishing this soon would allow us to get hacking on a much improved
gnome-software; but it's a lot of new code to write in time for
3.16...
Richard
_
On 3 April 2015 at 15:57, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> So I'm leaving this list.
Me too. If I was to troll people about the same uninteresting thing
again and again and again I would either get moderated or banned. If
anyone wants to reply, please reply to my personal email address.
Richard
_
Hi all,
I've been asked to write a hackfest page for a micro-turning-mini
hackfest I've been planning for April. The minimal page is at
https://wiki.gnome.org/Hackfests/GnomeSoftware2016 and I think we're
mostly self funded with the exception of one guy we'd quite like there
(and would need sponso
On 22 March 2016 at 17:47, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
> The short notice for the event will make it more difficult to get good
> value on travel/accommodation costs, which is why the travel committee
> asks that hackfests are organised well in advance and requests are
> sent it at least a month b
On 18 September 2017 at 18:10, Neil McGovern wrote:
> So, if you have any comments, or thoughts on how this can be improved,
> please reply, or drop me a mail - we plan on discussing this in detail
> at the Foundation Hackfest[0] at the start of next month!
When we were arranging the gnome-softwa
On 25 September 2017 at 10:48, Allan Day wrote:
> 1. Make it easier for non-Foundation members to get travel sponsorship. It
> would be useful to know if there are particular groups that this might apply
> to. Examples might include contributors who aren't members, potential
> contributors or exp
On 12 November 2017 at 21:44, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> We are wondering if there are others out there, or are considering having so
> that we can promote it?
Not strictly GNOME, but all related, there's the LVFS firmware
service: https://fwupd.org/donations
Richard.
___
2009/12/10 Richard Stallman :
> The presence of articles discussing vmware, for instance,
> conveys the message that GNOME sees nothing wrong with it.
I think you've added 1 and 1 and made 7.
Richard.
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gno
18 matches
Mail list logo
