On 6 August 2014 17:05, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
>
> On 08/06/2014 11:57 AM, Ryan Lortie wrote:
>>
>> I was disappointed (but not completely surprised) to learn that,
>> although OPW has expanded to many projects beyond GNOME, GNOME is left
>> handling all of the money for all participants at all org
On 6 August 2014 17:55, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
>
> On 08/06/2014 12:36 PM, Pascal Terjan wrote:
>>
>> I personnally have no problem with GNOME managing OPW but given that's
>> it getting bigger than GNOME itself it may make sense to have an
>> independant fou
On 7 August 2014 14:43, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
>
> On 08/07/2014 12:06 AM, Mathieu Duponchelle wrote:
>>
>>
>> Women do represent a pretty significant portion of the general
>> public, no? I think for men by men probably doesn't meet the
>> "general public" qualifier there.
>>
>>
>> "St
On 7 August 2014 15:02, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
>
> On 08/07/2014 09:50 AM, Pascal Terjan wrote:
>>
>> The discussion is not about the absence of OPW, but about not
>> providing the service of managing OPW for other organisations.
>> I haven't seen anyone sa
On 7 August 2014 15:16, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 08/07/2014 10:05 AM, Pascal Terjan wrote:
>>
>> I doesn't help. Do you think that because they could help this should
>> be the permanent solution and there is no need to find a better one?
>> Are
On 16 September 2014 13:50, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 14:01 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
>> Having 40k USD doesn't mean you get to spend that all on a developer.
>> At
>> least in Europe there is a huge amount of overhead (factor of 2.0-2.5
>> IIRC for .nl).
>
> It's a reasona
On 16 September 2014 17:44, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> hi Alexandre;
>
> On 16 September 2014 17:22, Alexandre Franke
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
>>> On 16 September 2014 16:09, Alexandre Franke
>>> wrote:
http://www.gnome.org/foundation/reports/ is
One thing I thought of would be to change the direction of the process
to be an invitation rather than an application.
If you see someone helping, instead of pushing him to apply you could
fill in the form describing his contributions (and possibly the name
of someone else who can support it) and i
On 12 February 2015 at 13:42, Magdalen Berns wrote:
>> One thing I thought of would be to change the direction of the process
>> to be an invitation rather than an application.
>> If you see someone helping, instead of pushing him to apply you could
>> fill in the form describing his contributions
On 12 February 2015 at 15:03, Magdalen Berns wrote:
>
>> On 12 February 2015 at 13:42, Magdalen Berns
>> wrote:
>> >> One thing I thought of would be to change the direction of the process
>> >> to be an invitation rather than an application.
>> >> If you see someone helping, instead of pushing h
On 12 February 2015 at 18:24, Andrea Veri wrote:
> 2015-02-12 14:42 GMT+01:00 Magdalen Berns :
>
>> I suggest we just make the rules much clearer to people on the outreach
>> pages by clarifying what "non-trivial" actually means. GSoC/OPW interns are
>> told to make more contributions after their
Hi,
the requested URL /vote/results.php was not found on this server.
On 9 June 2015 at 13:13, Fabiana Simões wrote:
> Hello, Foundation!
>
> We're happy to announce the preliminary results for this year's Board
> of Directors
> elections:
>
> Allan Day
> Andrea Veri
> Christian Hergert
> Cosimo
On 9 June 2015 at 13:13, Fabiana Simões wrote:
> Hello, Foundation!
>
> We're happy to announce the preliminary results for this year's Board
> of Directors
> elections:
>
> Allan Day
> Andrea Veri
> Christian Hergert
> Cosimo Cecchi
> Ekaterina Gerasimova
> Jeff Fortin Tam
> Shaun McCance
>
> (de
My annual adopt a hacker payment failed today due to an expired card,
so I decided to cancel it to change hacker as my adopted hacker is
sadly not really active anymore.
When I tried to do so, it no longer seems possible to get the annual one.
Text still says "Monthly or annual subscription payme
On 3 February 2016 at 11:27, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> On Mi, 2016-02-03 at 11:07 +0000, Pascal Terjan wrote:
>> When I tried to do so, it no longer seems possible to get the annual
>> one.
> Right. I think it hasn't been at least since we migrated to the
> Wordpress.
On 3 Feb 2016 11:41, "Pascal Terjan" wrote:
>
> On 3 February 2016 at 11:27, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> > On Mi, 2016-02-03 at 11:07 +, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> >> When I tried to do so, it no longer seems possible to get the annual
> >> one.
> > R
On 18 February 2016 at 16:34, Karen Sandler wrote:
> On 2016-02-18 11:20, Tobias Mueller wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On So, 2016-01-24 at 16:33 +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
>> * Unixstickers
>> * They're selling GNOME branded items
>> * No trademark licence agreement has ever been signed with them
>>
On 3 February 2016 at 11:07, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> My annual adopt a hacker payment failed today due to an expired card,
> so I decided to cancel it to change hacker as my adopted hacker is
> sadly not really active anymore.
>
> When I tried to do so, it no longer seems poss
On 9/12/07, BJörn Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is not true, but it is not laughable. I don't for a second doubt
> that you do not censor planet.gnome.org. But many months ago I emailed
> you and asked to get my blog syndicated. I never got any reply and
> left it as that because I didn
On 9/12/07, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All aggregation sites go through a process, like mailing lists, where as
> the number of participants goes up, the relevance and quality goes down.
> Look at O'Reilly's Radar, when there was only Tim, and no when there are
> 14 or 15 people postin
On 9/13/07, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Planet GNOME is about the people moreso than the project. We talk about the
> project *all the time*. The reason why I started Planet GNOME (and Planet!)
> was to read about and better understand the *people*. That's why full feeds
> are preferred
On Nov 29, 2007 11:48 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:03:38PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > I read http://boycottnovell.com/2007/11/05/gnome-mono-yelp/ with
> > great concern.
>
> (...)
>
> > However, making GNOME depend on Mono is running a
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Richard M. Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The FSF has a jobs page too: fsf.org/resources/jobs.
> Many GNOME-related jobs will qualify for listing there.
Hopefully :)
I would more interested by jobs which would qualify for both than by
jobs whih are about GNO
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
> For those who have already decided you're coming this year, please buy
> your tickets this month. From next month, prices will rise as people
> plan their Summer holidays.
>
Are there already estimations of hosting prices ?
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
> Having said all that, I think housing is a lower priority than flights.
> Don't wait for accommodation options to be announced before booking flights.
Well I won't buy plane ticket if I can't afford the hotel and I guess
I'm not alone :)
__
2009/3/16 Wouter Bolsterlee :
> This mailing list is for topics related to the Gnome Foundation, hence it is
> not an appropriate place to ask such questions.
It seems a lot of people see Support on
http://www.gtk.org/development.html and don't read the smaller lines.
Something should probably be
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> So, I don't really understand the details of the voting system, but
> wouldn't Srinivasa come in ahead of Diego based on the table above? Can
> someone explain this to me, at least.
Number of votes is not the most important
Let's imagi
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 13:34, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
>
> We just make it a requirement for becoming a foundation member. And we
> document this requirement on the live pages and in a welcome mail.
>
> If they don't introduce themselves, we just unmember them a few days
> later.
What about people
28 matches
Mail list logo
