On 05/10/2013 12:27 PM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Sumana Harihareswara
> wrote:
>> On 05/10/2013 10:17 AM, Rui Tiago Cação Matos wrote:
>>> Seriously, can everyone relax and not take every little detail so
>>> seriously? I'm all for advertising irc.gnome.org in
True, it's good to be forward-thinking; still, radical love is more
needed than radical hate.
I don't think you're advocating outright bigotry, but you're advocating
what the status quo is -- non-radical -- that is, the unchecked
allowance for privileged groups to espouse their views regardless of
Perhaps there's some work in documentation that would fit into a 1-month
period.
CCing gnome-doc-list for this reason
On 03/14/2014 01:41 PM, ChangSeok Oh wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> I’m looking for some interesting items for beginners to contribute to
> GNOME project.
> Long story short, I would get
In regards to this issue: I hope the board, to stymie discontent &
demonstrate equity, will settle on an equal solution for both Diego and
Sindhu, both outstanding members of our community.
With that said I really don't care to argue, but since nobody else has
called you out: nitpicks below & inli
Did you miss a [1]?
On 05/29/2014 03:19 PM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we'll be performing a little maintenance this night (CET TZ) to move our
> main mount points away from NFS to the Gluster native client. This will
> help our data to failover automatically to the other configured storage
> i
On 09/16/2014 12:22 PM, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
>> On 16 September 2014 16:09, Alexandre Franke
>> wrote:
>>> http://www.gnome.org/foundation/reports/ is a bit outdated, but it exists.
>>
>> minor correction: it's not really outdated. th
I don't fully understand why Ubuntu stopped providing the latest GNOME
packages (especially since Debian puts the effort into packing them
reasonably quickly most of the time).
On 09/26/2014 08:27 AM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:54:29PM +1000, Ali/amjjawad wrote:
I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed this. I started reading the
link and got an intense feeling of deja vu!
On 02/26/2016 04:46 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:48:18PM +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
* The item has been discussed during the meeting, details
are available
