Hi Britt,
we're thinking about extending the candidacy period like we did last
year. You'll get notice once we've decided to do so.
Reg. your second question: I guess it's best to mention your constraints
in your platform and let the membership decide.
Cheers,
Tobi
On Sun, 2019-05-26 at 18:5
Hi Britt,
Great to see you decided to go ahead and submit your candidacy! By way
of context, I'd say the minimum time commitment is around 2 hours a
week. We have a 1hr meeting every 2 weeks, and try to use the
alternative weeks as work sessions to make progress on the board's
projects. You need a
Membership,
there seems to be a bug in the membership form [1] that triggers in
specific situations (i.e when one of the text boxes for account name,
email, jabber account is filled in) that prevents the form to actually
submit and generate an actual ticket for the membership committee to
process.
On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 12:40 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
> Foundation members,
Dear Andrea,
>
due to no candidacies being received for the 2019 elections
Is this a clerical / copy paste error from an old announcement? From my
perspective I have seen four timely candidacies per the old timeline
(m
Robert,
I didn't express myself clearly enough: I really meant we haven't
received enough candidacies for the elections and the voting phase to
begin, thus the need to extend the timelines. We currently collected a
total of 5 candidates, 2 to go for the elections to actually start:
Allan Day
Brit
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 7:12 AM, Andrea Veri wrote:
I didn't express myself clearly enough: I really meant we haven't
received enough candidacies for the elections and the voting phase to
begin, thus the need to extend the timelines. We currently collected a
total of 5 candidates, 2 to go for th
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 5:48 AM wrote:
> This seems like case in point for why we should switch to two-year
> terms! Hopefully this will be the final election in which we elect
> seven directors all at the same time.
>
> Michael
>
+1. All of the current board members are in agreement that this s
Hi Carlos, Rob,
thanks for the fantastic answers :)
You've written:
On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 14:18 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> While my duty if I want to continue this work is to apply again and
> convince the membership to vote for me, this have a non-negligible
> overhead. In my case, the unc
Hi,
On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 07:48 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 7:12 AM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> > I didn't express myself clearly enough: I really meant we haven't
> > received enough candidacies for the elections and the voting phase
> > to
> > begin, thus the need to
Hi,
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 12:41 PM Tobias Mueller
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 07:48 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 7:12 AM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> > > I didn't express myself clearly enough: I really meant we haven't
> > > received enough candidacies f
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
The members deserve to have a choice of candidates. It is not good to
fill the board
11 matches
Mail list logo
