>
> There is indeed lack of context here. You strongly implied that the
>> board and the travel-committee was corrupt, which is an opinion that
>> you have every right to hold. If you do truly think that this is the
>> case, then it is my opinion that you should indeed raise the matter
>> with the
On 6 June 2014 07:38, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:20 A
>> >> 3) Check if the values spent are okay
>> >
>> > Here I am unsure what you are asking for. I published summaries in the
>> > past regarding to GUADEC, for example (Sorry for my English, it was
>> > rustier than now
Hi Fabiano
On 2014-06-06 09:09, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
Here is the whole conversation where, according to Ekaterina, I *strongly*
imply that the board and the travel committee are corrupt:
http://rachacuca.org/~fidencio/friendly_chat.log
I am extremely surprised to find details of Kat's pers
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
> On 6 June 2014 07:38, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:20 A
> >> >> 3) Check if the values spent are okay
> >> >
> >> > Here I am unsure what you are asking for. I published summaries in
> the
> >> > past regardin
Hello David,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:24 AM, David King wrote:
> Hi Fabiano
>
>
> On 2014-06-06 09:09, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>
>> Here is the whole conversation where, according to Ekaterina, I *strongly*
>> imply that the board and the travel committee are corrupt:
>> http://rachacuca.org/~
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:27 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> With or without a good reason, you took the non-polite way to answer.
> Why? I don't know, seriously.
When discussing such matters, you'll want to take out the sarcasm (which
you've applied in a few of your answers, it really doesn't h
Bastien,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:27 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>
>
> > With or without a good reason, you took the non-polite way to answer.
> > Why? I don't know, seriously.
>
> When discussing such matters, you'll want to take out
Just a last email coming from me on this topic.
1) I do *not* think that TC or/and Board are corrupt! (I said it a few
times before, but I'd like to emphasize it)
2) My questions were satisfied answered, thanks Germán, thanks Ekaterina.
Now I have a lot of links to read and then have or not more d
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 10:25 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> Again, sorry if I gave the wrong impression and please consider these
> two things if I did it:
> 1) I'm not a fluent English speaker (far away from that)
It's mostly fine, but I think the confusion came from this sentence:
"I've noticed
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 08:51 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >
> > >> > 3) Check if the values spent are okay
> > >>
> > >> Here I am unsure what you are asking for. I published summaries in the
> > >> past regarding to GUADEC, for example (Sorry for my English, it was
> > >> rustier than now):
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
