relicensing to GPLv3-family of licenses (was Re: Distribution Naming System)

2014-04-11 Thread Bradley M. Kuhn
Sébastien Wilmet wrote at 15:35 (EDT) on Sunday: > We can also upgrade our software licences to the GPLv3 and LGPLv3. While this is a separate issue from the main thread, I must admit that I personally would very much like to see this happen. I gave a talk at GUADEC four or five years ago now exp

Re: Changes on the GNOME Foundation Membership Committee

2014-04-11 Thread Aruna Sankaranarayanan
Hi, I am a member of the Docs team, and interned with the Foundation in OPW July - September'13. I would like to apply to become a part of the Membership Committee as well, because I think it's time I start getting more familiar with the organisational workings of GNOME. Best, Aruna

Current state of Foundation finances

2014-04-11 Thread Ekaterina Gerasimova
Dear Foundation members, Due to a shortfall in the budget, the Foundation board voted on 2014-04-08 to freeze all expenditure which is not essential to the running of the Foundation. This freeze affects sponsorship expenses which are unpaid at this time, but it does not affect the funds which we h

Re: Current state of Foundation finances

2014-04-11 Thread Mathieu Duponchelle
I'll play devil's advocate here: Couldn't GNOME use funds from these various sponsors to fund activities more directly beneficial to its future than OPW? I'll leave the question of what these other activities might be to the engagement core team, who discuss that at length and will certainly have

Re: Current state of Foundation finances

2014-04-11 Thread Germán Poo-Caamaño
On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 01:45 +0200, Mathieu Duponchelle wrote: > I'll play devil's advocate here: > > Couldn't GNOME use funds from these various sponsors to fund activities > more directly beneficial to its future than OPW? No, for two reasons: 1. My understanding after reading the FAQ is t

Re: Current state of Foundation finances

2014-04-11 Thread Mathieu Duponchelle
Thanks for the answer. I think the question deserves being asked, I'd be interested in other opinions, as well as hopefully facts about sponsors' involvement (of particular interest would be the question to know if they see sponsoring OPW as just a way to help GNOME at large or if they do have a p

Re: Current state of Foundation finances

2014-04-11 Thread meg ford
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Germán Poo-Caamaño wrote: > > I'll play devil's advocate here: > > > > Couldn't GNOME use funds from these various sponsors to fund activities > > more directly beneficial to its future than OPW? > I think a better approach might be: how can we motivate sponsors

Re: Current state of Foundation finances

2014-04-11 Thread Mathieu Duponchelle
I'm not sure this is a direct answer to the question I was asking, but yes it is clear that finding more funding would be beneficial in the absolute, I have absolutely no clue regarding that though :) On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 2:44 AM, meg ford wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Germán P

Re: Current state of Foundation finances

2014-04-11 Thread Sindhu S
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Ekaterina Gerasimova < kittykat3...@gmail.com> wrote: > The board expects that you may have some questions or would like to > know more details about the problem, please read > https://wiki.gnome.org/FoundationBoard/CurrentBudgetFAQ and contact > the board at board