Hi Emmanuele,
First at all, thanks to everybody for clarify the issue. However, I
would like to go to the point I was trying to make:
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 10:38 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> [...]
> > How is that none of the directors noticed this to fix it?
>
> I was honestly convinced that
On 03/05/2014 11:38 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
that's my mistake in the minutes: the "asked around" was referring to
the wiki page (https://wiki.gnome.org/Foundation/PrivacyCampaign2013)
we set up after the announcement of the privacy campaign results at
GUADEC, as well as informal polling of mai
hi Germán;
On 4 March 2014 19:24, Germán Póo-Caamaño wrote:
> Just an example after reading the minutes recently sent:
>
> = Minutes for Tuesday, December 10th, 2013, 16:00 UTC =
> [...]
>* We should also ask on foundation-list for ideas
>* '''ACTION''': ... to reach out to foundation-li
Le 04/03/2014 22:13, Jim Campbell a écrit :
> I brought up the topic in the GNOME community on Google Plus shortly
> after Karen's blog post about the topic:
Well, having multiple communication channels is nice for outreach, but
they can't replace official ones. I personnally follow nothing else t
Hi All,
I brought up the topic in the GNOME community on Google Plus shortly after
Karen's blog post about the topic:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JimCampbell/posts/NdPUm22fkkg
My apologies for not bringing the discussion to the foundation and board's
attention.
Jim
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:0
Hi.
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 11:24:40AM -0800, Germán Póo-Caamaño wrote:
> How is that none of the directors noticed this to fix it?
That is not the case. I raised the point that no email hit f-l. But it was not
considered to a problem as we decided to go with a call for bids.
Cheers,
Tobi
On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 00:55 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Fabiana Simões
> wrote:
> > [...]
> > To a large extent, I always expected this to be an active
> > communication channel between Foundation members and the board. The
> > meeting notes and agenda are gr
Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
...
> Well I can certainly start discussions. But I worry that apathy has
> set in on this list and I'm interested to know if that is the case.
Apathetic about what about what exactly, though? As I understand it,
the Foundation exists to take care of the housekeeping and
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Fabiana Simões
wrote:
> Quite honestly, I never expected broader discussions about the project
> to take place in this list. I believe those should welcome anyone
> interested, and not only Foundation members.
>
Ah I see, so people feel this is primarily a way for
Quite honestly, I never expected broader discussions about the project
to take place in this list. I believe those should welcome anyone
interested, and not only Foundation members.
To a large extent, I always expected this to be an active
communication channel between Foundation members and the b
10 matches
Mail list logo
