On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
wrote:
> I don't know what to say but remind you of "Assume people mean well"
> part of our code of conduct:
>
> https://wiki.gnome.org/action/show/Foundation/CodeOfConduct
Great point! :)
It's often hard or impossible to interpret tone in em
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Sindhu S wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
> wrote:
>
>> Oh your visa was rejected? Really sorry to hear, having been there
>> myself. Did they give any reasons?
>
> Why are you being sarcastic? You are very well aware of the issue and
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
wrote:
> Oh your visa was rejected? Really sorry to hear, having been there
> myself. Did they give any reasons?
Why are you being sarcastic? You are very well aware of the issue and
incidents preceding it.
This was your previous mail to the
Hi Sindhu,
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Sindhu S wrote:
> So what's the final consensus on the reimbursement of rejected visas?
Oh your visa was rejected? Really sorry to hear, having been there
myself. Did they give any reasons?
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hello Sindhu!
1. Visa reimbursements (and any other item listed under "What is NOT
eligible for sponsorship?" at [1]) will have to be approved by the Board to
pass. Reimbursements of these items should still be considered exceptional
and will be carefully evaluated by the Board. (the current Board
So what's the final consensus on the reimbursement of rejected visas?
Does this mean retroactive reimbursements?
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> = Minutes for Tuesday, July 25th, 2014, 16:00 UTC =
>
> == Next meeting ==
>
> * Wednesday, July 30th, 2014 at 09:00 UTC
>
> == A
