On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> First, while I'm extremely impressed by the huge variety of UI design
> ideas that GNOME has experimented with, and many of them have been quite
> successful, I think GNOME needs some mechanism to recognize when an idea
> isn't working or doe
Hi Erick
First, thanks to all of you for running as directors.
>
Thanks for your question!
Currently, GNOME is a strong platform for development, but it's lacking
> integration and features to be a complete, fully integrated desktop
> environment like Mac OS X, for instance. My question is:
>
>
Replying inline to your reply (stripping my own previous text):
[...]
> I'm not asking you to be technical, but to be managers. (Not saying
> here that manager can/should/must be non-technical)
[...]
> Being a director of the board for me, means having the power to
> allocate resources to make GNO
Hi Erick,
This is a little difficult to answer, since is a very wide question that
resembles "how can we make GNOME better?" which is what all of we try
to do, and I'm not sure most part of it is directly fixable by the
board, but instead indirectly.
Said that, as we know by the nature of GNOME b
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:52:55PM -0400, Erick Pérez Castellanos wrote:
> First, thanks to all of you for running as directors.
>
> Currently, GNOME is a strong platform for development, but it's lacking
> integration and features to be a complete, fully integrated desktop
> environment like Mac
Hey Erick!
Erick Pérez Castellanos wrote:
...
> First, thanks to all of you for running as directors.
>
> Currently, GNOME is a strong platform for development, but it's lacking
> integration and features to be a complete, fully integrated desktop
> environment like Mac OS X, for instance. My que
There's some comments inline.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Jeff Fortin Tam
wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> This is such a large question, and possibly a fairly technical one, I'm
> not sure it is within the scope of board candidates to debate this.
I'm not asking you to be technical, but to be man
Hi Erick,
This is such a large question, and possibly a fairly technical one, I'm
not sure it is within the scope of board candidates to debate this.
Unless you clearly define what you mean by "complete, fully integrated
desktop environment"… as everyone is going to have a different opinion
on wh
Hi:
First, thanks to all of you for running as directors.
Currently, GNOME is a strong platform for development, but it's lacking
integration and features to be a complete, fully integrated desktop
environment like Mac OS X, for instance. My question is:
"What plans do you have to make GNOME a m
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 11:21 +0200, Gil Forcada wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First of all thanks for running for this critical role on GNOME!
>
> My question is about hardware and contacts:
>
> The average user is not going to ever install its own operating system
> by itself, for them hardware and softw
On 05/27/2012 11:21 AM, Gil Forcada wrote:
My question is about hardware and contacts: The average user is not
going to ever install its own operating system by itself, for them
hardware and software come together and they die together, so a new
version of Windows means a new laptop and so on,
hi Gil;
On 27 May 2012 10:21, Gil Forcada wrote:
> My question is about hardware and contacts:
keeping good relations with ISVs, OSVs, and even OEMs is a fundamental
part of a complex software project like GNOME. we obviously need to
propose GNOME as a viable alternative to iOS, Winphone, and An
2012/5/27 Diego Escalante Urrelo :
> Hi Gil,
>
> Perhaps this link is relevant:
> http://makeplaylive.com/
>
> I would add this questions to your thread:
> Do you think a similar venture for GNOME would make sense?
> How do you think this, or a similar project, can happen without
> leaving us bankr
Hola!
On 27.05.2012 11:21, Gil Forcada wrote:
> So the crucial part here are ISV, contacting them, engaging with them
> and finally making them ship our great software to the end user.
>
> Is that something that you both find important and also will try to
> pursue if you are elected?
Hm. I think
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 11:21 +0200, Gil Forcada wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First of all thanks for running for this critical role on GNOME!
>
> My question is about hardware and contacts:
>
> The average user is not going to ever install its own operating system
> by itself, for them hardware and softw
2012/5/27 Gil Forcada :
> Hi all,
>
> First of all thanks for running for this critical role on GNOME!
>
> My question is about hardware and contacts:
>
> The average user is not going to ever install its own operating system
> by itself, for them hardware and software come together and they die
>
Hi Gil,
Perhaps this link is relevant:
http://makeplaylive.com/
I would add this questions to your thread:
Do you think a similar venture for GNOME would make sense?
How do you think this, or a similar project, can happen without
leaving us bankrupt?
Thanks! :-)
Diego
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 4
Hi all,
First of all thanks for running for this critical role on GNOME!
My question is about hardware and contacts:
The average user is not going to ever install its own operating system
by itself, for them hardware and software come together and they die
together, so a new version of Windows m
18 matches
Mail list logo
