Hello everyone,I would politely ask to end this thread, discussing the name
of Arch linux on this list accomplishes nothing.
2014-04-12 14:02 GMT+02:00 Richard Stallman :
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> By the way, there also an Arch Hurd distro[1] as well as a Debian
> GNU/kFr
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Mathieu Stumpf
wrote:
> Le mercredi 02 avril 2014 à 16:02 -0400, Richard Stallman a écrit :
>> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
>> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
>> [[[ foreign or domestic
Le mercredi 02 avril 2014 à 16:02 -0400, Richard Stallman a écrit :
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> Thi
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
The basic point of your message is a variant of a FAQ,
http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-lin
As much as I would like to call this thread off and stop the off topic
trend, I can't help but get this out of my chest:
Richard, I think you should think about why GNU got itself in such
situation, the GNU project failed to build a brand and communicate an
appealing message, Linux built a great b
On 3 April 2014 19:18, Richard Stallman wrote:
> That's true. Most distros do not recognize that this system is
> basically GNU; they give the credit for the GNU Project's work
> to Mr Torvalds, rather than to us.
By calling it Linux, I'm also not recognizing the work of the Apache
foundation. I
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
By calling it Linux, I'm also not recognizing the work of the Apache
foundati
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
As many people on this list know, I too prefer the term GNU/Linux, and
it's
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
the name of distributions and whether or not it conforms to the
requests of t
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> I have done a
okay, can we please stop this pointless thread on foundation-list?
the name of distributions and whether or not it conforms to the
requests of the GNU project has nothing to do with the GNOME project
or the GNOME Foundation.
if you want to propose a name change, or want to raise the issue of
the
Btw, in the name of my system there is GNU/Linux credit:
$ uname -a
Linux yoseforb 3.14.0-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Apr 1 23:08:28 CEST
2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Regards,
Yosef Or Boczko
בתאריך ה', אפר 3, 2014 בשעה 9:06 PM, Karen Sandler
כתב:
On 2014-04-03 04:28, Ali/amjjawad wrote:
> Arch is
On 2014-04-03 04:28, Ali/amjjawad wrote:
Arch is a variant of the GNU/Linux system, so please let's not call it
"Arch Linux". Calling the whole system "Linux" is, in effect, giving
Torvalds credit for our work, so we get no credit for it.
See http://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html [1] and
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
I have done a quick search on the 'active' distributions on DistroWatch.com
a
Dear Mr. Stallman,
First of all, it is a pleasure to be with you on the same mailing list. You
have my full respect!
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution again
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
That logic, if followed to its end,
"If followed to its end" usually means "if I
That logic, if followed to its end, means Fedora is giving no credit to GNU
or Linux. If a high-level application needed to cite all its components in
its name, that could be inconvenient.
I wouldn't call ArchLinux's name an error personally but hey :)
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Richard St
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
This mean, there is an ArchLinux system, which is a GNU/Linux
system, not onl
I agree about the term of GNU/Linux, but the problem is I can't
change the name of an exist distribution.
This mean, there is an ArchLinux system, which is a GNU/Linux
system, not only Linux system, but the name is still ArchLinux.
To say "the ArchLinux distribution, GNU/Linux system" is too lon
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Arch is a variant of the GNU/Linux system, so please let's not call it
"Arch Linux".
21 matches
Mail list logo
