around 0.3 percent of enwiki's content. This is just to test
whether or not it's beneficial, and we don't plan on keeping every single
form in place :).
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
7;s not
> suddenly going to turn up on projects other than enwiki without a lot
> more discussion and consultation.
>
> But then I've just been watching the process quietly from the
> sidelines: I may have got this all wrong.
>
> --
> Tom Morris
> <http://tommorr
ember 2011 13:11, Oliver Keyes wrote:
> That's correct, Tom. 0.3 percent of the English language Wikipedia is
> being used as a testbed for the *rest* of the English-language Wikipedia;
> a tertiary testbed, since we've already run things through on both
> prototype and labs
rsion currently
> running on the remaining 99.7% of en.wp, please?
>
> -Liam
>
> Peace, love & metadata
>
> On 23/12/2011, at 0:11, Oliver Keyes wrote:
>
> > That's correct, Tom. 0.3 percent of the English language Wikipedia is
> being
> > used as a
I'm not seeing the problem there, actually; the feedback page itself isn't
up yet (again, just for testing) so editors aren't expected to do anything
with the feedback. Am I missing something?
On 22 December 2011 17:25, geni wrote:
> On 22 December 2011 13:11, Oliver Keyes
a from readers to know
> whether it's working. Then iterate, improve, rollout to a slightly larger
> set, repeat :-)
>
> However, I'd like to contest the two reasons you've given for not turning
> off AFTv4 in the mean time.
>
> On 23/12/2011, at 3:49, Oliver Keyes wro
ason for us to not jump the gun and switch it off prematurely.
>
> --
> Tom Morris
> <http://tommorris.org/>
>
> _______
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikime
ia).
>>
>> Even if we are no longer using the data collected from the previous
>> incarnation of the AFT (I've looked at a few articles I've written to
>> see what the AFTers think of it, and it is a minor curiosity), the
>> fact that it may be encour
s well as being
> > > unclear. As such I don't think they are helping your argument, however
> > > strong you might hold your opinions on the topic.
> >
> > I don't really get the "unclear" bit.
>
> It is extremely unclear to me what connection there is be
We'll hopefully have the chance (and time!) to
experiment with some new positions, a couple of which were user-suggested.
On 24 December 2011 11:38, David Gerard wrote:
> On 24 December 2011 11:23, Oliver Keyes wrote:
>
> > So, to reply to Liam's point first - no, that'
ings
which would explain why we're talking at cross-threads.
On 24 December 2011 11:43, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Oliver Keyes
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > To reply to Jussi; I think we're uniformly confused as to what you think
&g
rote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Oliver Keyes
> wrote:
> > The article feedback tool has nothing to do with approving edits, though.
> > Lets roll the conversation back; can you succinctly tell me how you
> > perceive the Article Feedback Tool, or what you know a
I'm absolutely fine with that, sure.
On 24 December 2011 12:02, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Oliver Keyes
> wrote:
> > Not...really. I'm not interested in getting more information on your
> > opinion *on* the AFT - we've got
, MZMcBride wrote:
> Oliver Keyes wrote:
> > To reply to Jussi; I think we're uniformly confused as to what you think
> is
> > the link between an encyclopedia written by experts, and an encyclopedia
> > that asks average joes to provide comments on articles (other than t
in any of
the testing or design, please feel free to email me. Other than that, merry
Newtonmas to all of you.
On 24 December 2011 18:20, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Oliver Keyes
> wrote:
> > The option to self-identify as an expert is more to try
l be
staying in the chan until 23:00 UTC to deal with any questions from
latecomers, so pop in if you have any questions and a free moment.
Thanks
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
foundati
One simple idea I had (personal capacity, etc etc) - we stick lots of
banners at the top of the article saying "this has X problem! Be
careful!". Would it be possible to have them appear differently to
say, anonymous IPs, and display a more friendly message encouraging
the users to register and dea
Check the IP history; Jan-Bart added them ;p
On 4 January 2012 16:21, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> Check the page history - I don't think those bits were added by the
> foundation.
> On Jan 4, 2012 3:26 PM, "WereSpielChequers"
> wrote:
>
> > Re Tom's suggestion that we have an RFC on meta to discuss
rows, but a
> lessening which can be mitigated to some degree.
>
> Bodnotbod
>
> ___
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
r the feedback page and to
provide feedback (hah) on it. Hope to see you all there :).
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
ion-D-12-28.png
[4]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Article_feedback/Data_and_metrics
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
__
__
> Philippe Beaudette
> Head of Reader Relations
> Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
>
> 415-839-6885, x 6643
>
> phili...@wikimedia.org
> _______
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/
on-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Sure; if the objective is to have comments by "people who are interested in
the subject, can identify the relevant venue, can identify how to edit the
relevant venue, are aware that they *can* edit, can handle wikimarkup and
can deal with the fact that a lot of editors see "wide-ranging discussions
Hey guys
We'll be holding another AFT office hours session at 19:00 tomorrow, in
#wikimedia-office; hope to see a lot of you there :). If you can't make it,
drop me an email and I'll send you the logs.
Thanks!
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikim
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
