On 9 September 2010 01:56, Sue Gardner wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm delighted to tell you that the Wikimedia Foundation has just hired
> its first-ever Chief Talent and Culture Officer. Cyn Skyberg will
> begin work with us this coming Monday, September 13. She'll report to
> me
> I am delighte
Dear WikimediaUK, Cultural Partnerships & Foundation-l mailing lists,
On behalf of Wikimedia UK I am pleased to formally announce the second
edition of the GLAM-WIKI conference - this time to be held in London at the
British Museum on the 26th and 27th of November. The purpose of this
conference i
Hi all,
Sue Gardner, the Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation, will
be having office hours this Thursday (September 16) at 17:00 UTC
(10:00 PT, 13:00 ET, 19:00 CEST) on IRC in #wikimedia-office.
If you do not have an IRC client, there are two ways you can come chat
using a web brow
I have recently been reading the Ambassadors, by Henry James. Here is the
version from 2005:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Ambassadors&oldid=32161591
Here is the current version
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ambassadors
They are both very bad. So, two points. (1)
I also posted this to the Wikipedia Review here
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=30718&view=findpost&p=252408
We ought to become closer, no?
Peace, love, metadata etc
Peter
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia
> I have recently been reading the Ambassadors, by Henry James. Here is the
> version from 2005:
>
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Ambassadors&oldid=32161591
>
>
>
> Here is the current version
>
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ambassadors
>
>
>
> They are b
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Peter Damian
wrote:
> I have recently been reading the Ambassadors, by Henry James. Here is the
> version from 2005:
>
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Ambassadors&oldid=32161591
>
>
>
> Here is the current version
>
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.or
That was awkward!
Meant to be:
On a day in 2005, my hair was too long and not well kept.
On a day in 2010, it was again too long and not well kept.
Obviously in 5 years, nothing has changed.
~Nathan
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.w
I thought you were awarding the post a score of 0 :)
Ryan Kaldari
On 9/14/10 3:05 PM, Nathan wrote:
> That was awkward!
>
> Meant to be:
>
> On a day in 2005, my hair was too long and not well kept.
>
> On a day in 2010, it was again too long and not well kept.
>
> Obviously in 5 years, nothing h
Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> I thought you were awarding the post a score of 0 :)
It would be all too cheap a jibe to attribute to a self-proclaimed
philosopher an ignorance of scientific method and assert that blind adoption
of the continuity principle is contrary to that method; however, it is fair
10 matches
Mail list logo
