As an attempt to revive and reform the new project policy page on meta
(http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/New_project_policy), the content scope task
force at strategy.wikimedia.org has written a new draft.
Feedback, additions and changes to that page is very much appreciated. The
draft is found a
Samuel Klein writes:
> Ram, thanks for sharing your interesting project.
|
| On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Platonides wrote:
| >
| >> Librelist is a free as in freedom mailing list site for open source
| >> projects. It is a place for FOSS communities to discuss all the things they
| >> want
On 04/29/2010 06:32 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
> William Pietri wrote:
>
>> As requested, here's the weekly Flagged Protection update.
>>
>>
>> We continue to work on UI display issues and on getting up a Labs
>> version of the German Wikipedia. We're pretty close to release, and we
>> believe onl
On 29 April 2010 22:24, William Pietri wrote:
> As requested, here's the weekly Flagged Protection update.
>
>
> We continue to work on UI display issues and on getting up a Labs
> version of the German Wikipedia. We're pretty close to release, and we
> believe only minor UI issues remain.
You ar
On 04/30/2010 03:28 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 29 April 2010 22:24, William Pietri wrote:
>
>> As requested, here's the weekly Flagged Protection update.
>>
>>
>> We continue to work on UI display issues and on getting up a Labs
>> version of the German Wikipedia. We're pretty close to rele
On 1 May 2010 00:06, William Pietri wrote:
> Hi. Thanks for the comment.
>
> Just to be clear, we didn't completely ignore that comment, or any
> other; we've been going through the comments on phone meetings every
> week. We did, however, fail to respond to that one, which I'm sorry for.
> I'll m
William,
You thanked Thomas three times in that e-mail. If I may say so, such
courtesy is unwarranted, in light of the terseness of his most recent
post. We're all volunteers, so colour me confused as to why people
think head-biting will achieve anything.
YMMV.
Anthony
_
On 1 May 2010 00:50, Anthony wrote:
> William,
>
> You thanked Thomas three times in that e-mail. If I may say so, such
> courtesy is unwarranted, in light of the terseness of his most recent
> post. We're all volunteers, so colour me confused as to why people
> think head-biting will achieve anyt
> My understanding is that William is being paid.
Seriously? Well, okay then. If that's what our grants are being spent on…
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundati
On 04/30/2010 04:55 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>> You thanked Thomas three times in that e-mail. If I may say so, such
>> courtesy is unwarranted, in light of the terseness of his most recent
>> post. We're all volunteers, so colour me confused as to why people
>> think head-biting will achieve anyth
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Anthony wrote:
>> My understanding is that William is being paid.
>
> Seriously? Well, okay then. If that's what our grants are being spent on…
Jeez, does it matter? If William's style is to deal with cranky
comments by being as polite as possible and acknowledgin
On 1 May 2010 01:14, William Pietri wrote:
> On 04/30/2010 04:55 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>>> You thanked Thomas three times in that e-mail. If I may say so, such
>>> courtesy is unwarranted, in light of the terseness of his most recent
>>> post. We're all volunteers, so colour me confused as to w
On 04/30/2010 05:19 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>> I'm intrigued by the notion that you don't have to be nice to people
>> > that are paid to deal with you. Since I gave the foundation a 70%
>> > discount from my normal rates, perhaps you can shoot for a mix of 70%
>> > courtesy and 30% head-biting
On 1 May 2010 01:32, William Pietri wrote:
> You should keep in mind that it definitely takes me more time and more
> energy to deal with non-nice requests.
Really? How does me adding more words to my emails save you time?
___
foundation-l mailing list
On 04/30/2010 05:37 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 1 May 2010 01:32, William Pietri wrote:
>
>> You should keep in mind that it definitely takes me more time and more
>> energy to deal with non-nice requests.
>>
> Really? How does me adding more words to my emails save you time?
>
It
On 1 May 2010 02:23, William Pietri wrote:
> As long as we're on the topic of etiquette, I find it frustrating when
> people pick out one particular bit to reply to and ignore the broader
> point. I add that only because I'm not sure if this was part of your
> intentional policy against niceness,
(Sorry for top-posting: Blackberry.)
I just want to add a brief note supporting what William's saying. Yes -- it
definitely takes more time to respond to angry or hostile-seeming mails. Trust
gets impaired, and so the respondent spends time trying to figure out whether
the person's really ang
Can anyone remind me what the per day and per month post limits are,
and confirm that someone is still keeping track?
We've established in the past that a collegial atmosphere is desired
by the people who post to and read this list. Some have never agreed,
but that is why some have previously been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Respect.
If you can't, use private mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJL25CxAAoJEHCAuDvx9Z6LC8MIANso1Zh8avMk3EAeYwtZ4Tse
nFt7NBCbSa67bWJOW5
19 matches
Mail list logo
