[Foundation-l] Flagged Revisions, Report on german WP

Hiho, there have been some significant developments on de-WP, which I would like to share with this list. On February, 4th, all articles of the german WP had at least one sighted revision. Since then, only pages newly created by noneditors have to be looked at. On average, around 1.000 pages were

Re: [Foundation-l] Flagged Revisions, Report on german WP

2009/2/15 P. Birken : > On February, 4th, all articles of the german WP had at least one > sighted revision. Since then, only pages newly created by noneditors > have to be looked at. On average, around 1.000 pages were marked for > the first time per day and these are now carried over to looking a

Re: [Foundation-l] Flagged Revisions, Report on german WP

2009/2/15 P. Birken : > Hiho, > > there have been some significant developments on de-WP, which I would > like to share with this list. > > On February, 4th, all articles of the german WP had at least one > sighted revision. Since then, only pages newly created by noneditors > have to be looked at.

Re: [Foundation-l] Flagged Revisions, Report on german WP

2009/2/15 geni : > 2009/2/15 P. Birken : >> Hiho, >> >> there have been some significant developments on de-WP, which I would >> like to share with this list. >> >> On February, 4th, all articles of the german WP had at least one >> sighted revision. Since then, only pages newly created by nonedito

Re: [Foundation-l] Flagged Revisions, Report on german WP

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:33 PM, geni wrote: > 2009/2/15 P. Birken : >> Hiho, >> >> there have been some significant developments on de-WP, which I would >> like to share with this list. >> >> On February, 4th, all articles of the german WP had at least one >> sighted revision. Since then, only pa

[Foundation-l] Wikimedia and public sector involvement, connections

Dear all,I was wondering if any of you know of cases where there has been any (official) connection between members of the public sector and projects of Wikimedia (or other independent projects under free licences). I would be interested in cases, when for example * the local government has used f

Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia and public sector involvement, connections

Recently 100,000 historical photos were released by some German agency (Can't think of it's name) to the wikimedia commons. On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Bence Damokos wrote: > Dear all,I was wondering if any of you know of cases where there has been > any (official) connection between member

Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia and public sector involvement, connections

There has been a 100k image donation by the German federal archive (Bundesarchiv). A brief description of the project is on Commons at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bundesarchiv Regards, ChrisiPK Patton 123 schrieb: > Recently 100,000 historical photos were released by some German

Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia and public sector involvement, connections

Hoi, That was the Bundesarchiv. Thanks, GerardM http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Bundesarchiv 2009/2/15 Patton 123 > Recently 100,000 historical photos were released by some German agency > (Can't think of it's name) to the wikimedia commons. > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Bence Da

Re: [Foundation-l] Flagged Revisions, Report on german WP

Andre Engels wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:33 PM, geni wrote: > >> 2009/2/15 P. Birken : >> >>> Hiho, >>> >>> there have been some significant developments on de-WP, which I would >>> like to share with this list. >>> >>> On February, 4th, all articles of the german WP had at least on