On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:55 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 25 October 2011 17:52, Andreas K. wrote:
>
> > For those interested, there is a current request for arbitration on
> English
> > Wikipedia related to the board resolution on controversial content, which
> > contains some further views and
media projects
(+55) 85 88393509
30440865
> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:55:26 +0100
> From: dger...@gmail.com
> To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] moderation soft limit
>
> On 25 October 2011 17:52, Andreas K. wrote:
>
> > For tho
On 25 October 2011 17:52, Andreas K. wrote:
> For those interested, there is a current request for arbitration on English
> Wikipedia related to the board resolution on controversial content, which
> contains some further views and discussion. I have summarised my view that
> our illustrations, j
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Thomas Morton wrote:
> >
> > There was a 30 post per person monthly "soft" limit on foundation-l.
> >
>
> My apologies; I was unaware of this soft limit.
>
> Happy to abide by it :) and I hope others will too! And, so, this should be
> my last post for this month.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Thomas Morton
wrote:
>
>> I think people who think have got the point, but we still have to "whack
> the mole" at trolls and endless griefers.
>
> I'm also annoyed at being characterised in this way by someone who has
> maintained only the barest level of civility
>
> There was a 30 post per person monthly "soft" limit on foundation-l.
>
My apologies; I was unaware of this soft limit.
Happy to abide by it :) and I hope others will too! And, so, this should be
my last post for this month. FWIW I entirely agree that less vocal posters
may be put off by large
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Andrew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
> wrote:
>> This is very very meta. But in my own defence, I haven't posted
>> anything for over a year. Mourning my dearly departed mother. I have
>> said before that monthly limits ar
On 21 October 2011 16:02, Andrew Garrett wrote:
> These discussions have gone in circles for a month now, and it's the
> same five or ten people (yes, I am again being rhetorical, please
> don't bother checking that number) arguing past each other and posting
> their entrenched positions again and
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
wrote:
> This is very very meta. But in my own defence, I haven't posted
> anything for over a year. Mourning my dearly departed mother. I have
> said before that monthly limits are prejudicial against those that
> rarely post, but do post whe
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:19, John Vandenberg wrote:
> Somehow David Gerard, Milos Rancic, Kim and Tobias Oelgarte made it to
> 96, 95, 89 and 83 posts last month. Last month Thomas Dalton,
> Jussi-Ville Heiskanen and I posted 39, 37 and 35 times respectively,
> and everyone else was under the 3
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Kirill Lokshin
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:34 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jon Davis wrote:
>> > IIRC, They said that the "soft limit" would simply mean that they'd make
>> > sure any post beyond 30 were at least somewh
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:34 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jon Davis wrote:
> > IIRC, They said that the "soft limit" would simply mean that they'd make
> > sure any post beyond 30 were at least somewhat useful. The impression I
> got
> > was that if you wanted t
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jon Davis wrote:
> IIRC, They said that the "soft limit" would simply mean that they'd make
> sure any post beyond 30 were at least somewhat useful. The impression I got
> was that if you wanted to send 100 at least semi-constructive emails, you'd
> get through. If
IIRC, They said that the "soft limit" would simply mean that they'd make
sure any post beyond 30 were at least somewhat useful. The impression I got
was that if you wanted to send 100 at least semi-constructive emails, you'd
get through. If you want to flame and flame and flame ... you'd get cut at
14 matches
Mail list logo
