Original Message--
> From: Thomas Dalton
> Sender: foundation-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
> To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> ReplyTo: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Privacy etc - merging data
> Sent: 17 Jul 2010 07:05
>
> On 17 J
An additional question; is there going to be an explicit need to gain
permission, or is it simply going to be the implicit assumption that the
person does/does not want their information stored?
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 17 July 2010 18:29, Sue Gardner wrote:
> >
On 17 July 2010 18:29, Sue Gardner wrote:
> Sorry -- is there a question outstanding? I know Nathan posted some
> questions about the annual plan (which I think Veronique'll answer, and if
> she she doesn't I will). If there was something else, I think it slipped
> right past me.
Lodewijk re
mas Dalton
Sender: foundation-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
ReplyTo: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Privacy etc - merging data
Sent: 17 Jul 2010 07:05
On 17 July 2010 13:53, Lodewijk wrote:
> I'd rather not speculate about w
On 17 July 2010 13:53, Lodewijk wrote:
> I'd rather not speculate about what happens or the intent before someone
> from the WMF who is responsible for this clarifies the statement. I hope we
> all can hold ourselves from guessing and seeking logic until that moment.
This is foundation-l... your
I'd rather not speculate about what happens or the intent before someone
from the WMF who is responsible for this clarifies the statement. I hope we
all can hold ourselves from guessing and seeking logic until that moment.
Lodewijk
2010/7/17 Oliver Keyes
> So the logic seems to be thus - if I t
*So the logic seems to be thus - if I tell employee X something about my
life, interests, experience, C.V. that could possibly be of use or interest
to the Foundation, it's fine to store it on a central database where all and
sundry within the Foundation can get at it, despite the fact that this wa
So the logic seems to be thus - if I tell employee X something about my
life, interests, experience, C.V. that could possibly be of use or interest
to the Foundation, it's fine to store it on a central database where all and
sundry within the Foundation can get at it, despite the fact that this was
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Lodewijk wrote:
>
> I am assuming that people will be warned and asked for permission in advance
> to combine these databases? I for one would definitely have strong
> objections against merging donation and edit data. Donations are real life,
> edits are wikipedi
On 16 July 2010 13:14, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> As far as I know the data involved is exempt from having to be registered
> with the registrar in the Netherlands. This is the type of data that is
> essential for the running of an organisation like ours. You may feel
> uncomfortable about th
Hoi,
As far as I know the data involved is exempt from having to be registered
with the registrar in the Netherlands. This is the type of data that is
essential for the running of an organisation like ours. You may feel
uncomfortable about this but that is tough. What is important is the way the
da
11 matches
Mail list logo
