2011/3/4 Birgitte SB :
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Teofilo
>> To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
>> Sent: Fri, March 4, 2011 5:05:11 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Moral rights
>>
>> 2011/2/27 Birgitte SB :
>> >
- Original Message
> From: Teofilo
> To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
> Sent: Fri, March 4, 2011 5:05:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Moral rights
>
> 2011/2/27 Birgitte SB :
> > No one wants to attack French moral rights, or the attack the
This thread is at a bit too theoretical a plane for me to follow in detail.
(As it happens, I'm a lawyer, but of course not a French lawyer.) Can
someone give a specific instance (theoretical or historical) where the
assertion of droit moral as applied to wiki content beyond what is expressly
pres
Next thing these people will shutdown wikipedia because the french law says
impre*scriptible*, and they will say that because wikipedia uses JS and so
is scriptable, it shouldn't be around. What don't you like about the licence
anyway? It is my opinion that the laws of the most influentual country
2011/3/4 Teofilo :
> 2011/3/4 Teofilo :
> (...)
>> (3) For example Spanish copyright law article 14 "derechos
>> irrenunciables e inalienables (...) Exigir el reconocimiento de su
>> condición de autor de la obra"
>>
>> http://civil.udg.es/normacivil/estatal/reals/Lpi.html
>>
>> They are also provi
2011/3/4 Teofilo :
(...)
> (3) For example Spanish copyright law article 14 "derechos
> irrenunciables e inalienables (...) Exigir el reconocimiento de su
> condición de autor de la obra"
>
> http://civil.udg.es/normacivil/estatal/reals/Lpi.html
>
> They are also provided an international recogniti
2011/3/4 David Gerard :
> On 4 March 2011 11:05, Teofilo wrote:
>
>> No one ? I would not say so. I would rather say that 75.8% (1) want to
>> attack moral rights, which are not French only (3), and, as I showed
>> in my previous mail, are a value taken into account in Wikimedia
>> projects in suc
On 4 March 2011 11:05, Teofilo wrote:
> No one ? I would not say so. I would rather say that 75.8% (1) want to
> attack moral rights, which are not French only (3), and, as I showed
> in my previous mail, are a value taken into account in Wikimedia
> projects in such documents as
> http://commons
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Teofilo wrote:
> In my opinion, the people who want to attack this, are on a sloppery
> slope where the next step is when they request you to waive your human
> rights.
Are you quite serious?
--vvv
___
foundation-l mai
2011/2/27 Birgitte SB :
> No one wants to attack French moral rights, or the attack the idiosyncrasies
> of
> any particular legal jurisdiction. What we want to do is curate a large
> international collection of free content that will remain free content 300
> years
> from now after all of us ar
Moral rights is one of the core values which used to be defended at
least in the past, at least by a few community members. Things are
changing so quickly these days that I can be sure of nothing, but it
seems to be still the case today as shown on
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/COM:OTRS#Declar
> It would seem that the right to license one's own work as one chooses is
> one of those rights. How does French law resolve that conflict?
By declaring that the contract where the contractant "chooses" to
waive a fundamental right is void.
You find the same line of thought in Jean Jacques Rouss
Indeed. It always starts with the finer details of CC 3.0. and it may
well end in genocide.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Teofilo wrote:
> French authorship rights law:
>
> Article L121-1
> An author shall enjoy the right to respect for his name, his
> authorship and his work.
> Th
No one wants to attack French moral rights, or the attack the idiosyncrasies of
any particular legal jurisdiction. What we want to do is curate a large
international collection of free content that will remain free content 300
years
from now after all of us are dead and can no longer be person
> French authorship rights law:
>
> Article L121-1
>An author shall enjoy the right to respect for his name, his
> authorship and his work.
>This right shall attach to his person.
>It shall be perpetual, inalienable and imprescriptible. It may
> be transmitted mortis causa t
15 matches
Mail list logo
