Behavior on many projects IS outrageous; when someone complains the
response is almost universally that the foundation doesn't get
involved in local project business.
Mark
skype: node.ue
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> Virgilio A. P. Machado wrote:
>> Marc, you comment
Virgilio A. P. Machado wrote:
> Marc, you comment is not very optimistic, but it was a great
> incentive to do what I announced above. Hopefully others will be more
> encouraged to voice their ideas about other matters, knowing they'll
> find a friendly hear and some useful and very welcome feed
Steven Walling wrote:
> 1. You're wrong. Just today I myself received some kind words offlist, but
> related to a thread. Just because you're not getting the air of friendliness
> you desire (at this moment anyway), doesn't mean friendliness doesn't exist.
>
Getting friendly words offlist, says
1. You're wrong. Just today I myself received some kind words offlist, but
related to a thread. Just because you're not getting the air of friendliness
you desire (at this moment anyway), doesn't mean friendliness doesn't exist.
2. It's a mailing list for discussion and debate, not an outlet for p
The most significant problem, Virgilio, is that there isn't too much people
on this list can do. Unless and until problems become so clear that steward
or Foundation action are obviously called for, there is unlikely to be much
concrete action at all. Since we can't impose a solution to the problem
on 6/29/09 8:35 PM, Virgilio A. P. Machado at v...@fct.unl.pt wrote:
> Talking about antisocial... It's quite interesting what I experienced
> in this very list.
>
> I wasn't aware of the study published in the New Scientist until I
> read about it here on the list, and appreciate the information
