On 24/03/11 02:19, Nikola Smolenski wrote:
> On 03/23/2011 07:58 AM, Tim Starling wrote:
>> I think it would be nice to have a special extension for this, rather
>> than use interwiki transclusion, since that would make it easy to
>> implement nicer formatting of language link lists on the central
On 03/23/2011 07:58 AM, Tim Starling wrote:
> I think it would be nice to have a special extension for this, rather
> than use interwiki transclusion, since that would make it easy to
> implement nicer formatting of language link lists on the central wiki.
> I don't think we really want a wiki with
On 21/03/11 09:27, Andre Engels wrote:
> I guess I'm awfully inadequate at that then... Moving interwikis to a
> separate site is something that I first proposed back in 2002
> (although then saying it was 'something for the (far?) future'), that
> has many community members and I think also develo
On 22/03/11 04:59, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
> ... So that's another opportunity to mention the request to enable it,
> open since September 2008:
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15607
>
> Are there still any technical barriers to enabling it?
I've done a review of the Interwiki ext
Marcus Buck wrote:
> Peter17 had a Google Summer of Code project in which he developed code
> that allows interwiki transclusion. And Nikola Smolenski's Interlanguage
> extension is developed since 2008.
>
> So it's not the volunteers who lack. Apparently the main problem is "get
> it applied to t
2011/3/21 Gerard Meijssen :
> Hoi,
> One technical resource lacking is time. The 1.17 code is not stable enough
> for a full release. There is a lot of code that wants to go into 1.18 and
> until new releases are going to appear regularly a lot of stuff will
> continue to wait for it to happen. At
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
wrote:
> ... So that's another opportunity to mention the request to enable it,
> open since September 2008:
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15607
>
> Are there still any technical barriers to enabling it?
I believe both interwiki
Hoi,
One technical resource lacking is time. The 1.17 code is not stable enough
for a full release. There is a lot of code that wants to go into 1.18 and
until new releases are going to appear regularly a lot of stuff will
continue to wait for it to happen. At this moment the feet of the developers
2011/3/21 Marcus Buck
>
> An'n 21.03.2011 09:27, hett Andre Engels schreven:
> > I guess I'm awfully inadequate at that then... Moving interwikis to a
> > separate site is something that I first proposed back in 2002
> > (although then saying it was 'something for the (far?) future'), that
> > has
An'n 21.03.2011 09:27, hett Andre Engels schreven:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Ashar Voultoiz wrote:
>
>> You do have the power! The world as immensely changed in the last few
>> years thanks to the internet. Internet is just about connecting people
>> and every little step is a change. G
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Ashar Voultoiz wrote:
> You do have the power! The world as immensely changed in the last few
> years thanks to the internet. Internet is just about connecting people
> and every little step is a change. Get an idea, get community members
> sharing it then you c
11 matches
Mail list logo
