Re: [Foundation-l] mobile website

2012-01-18 Thread Yaroslav M. Blanter
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:07:42 +0200, Zugravu Gheorghe wrote: > bringing my 5 cents: think that mobile users are not the one privileged > here, since anyone can surf on m.wp. Guess that limited usability of > m.wp compensate 100% lack of normanl WP. (following my friends post on > WP this morning -

Re: [Foundation-l] mobile website

2012-01-18 Thread Erik Moeller
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:09 AM, David Gerard wrote: > Only bots (I think) and some WMF people can edit en:wp today. Stewards and staff. No bots. -- Erik Möller VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate __

Re: [Foundation-l] mobile website

2012-01-18 Thread David Gerard
On 18 January 2012 09:05, Huib Laurens wrote: > So lets say that Wikipedia doesn't have a active anti vandal crew today, > but people can still edit within the English Wikipedia by mobile phone. > So we will find in a year all kind of vandal edits done today? Only bots (I think) and some WMF pe

Re: [Foundation-l] mobile website

2012-01-18 Thread Zugravu Gheorghe
bringing my 5 cents: think that mobile users are not the one privileged here, since anyone can surf on m.wp. Guess that limited usability of m.wp compensate 100% lack of normanl WP. (following my friends post on WP this morning - everyone feels disturbed by this, and I am not from an english speaki

Re: [Foundation-l] mobile website

2012-01-18 Thread Huib Laurens
So lets say that Wikipedia doesn't have a active anti vandal crew today, but people can still edit within the English Wikipedia by mobile phone. So we will find in a year all kind of vandal edits done today? ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lis

Re: [Foundation-l] mobile website

2012-01-18 Thread David Gerard
On 18 January 2012 08:58, John Vandenberg wrote: > the emergency access should be at a different location. > mobile users should not be privileged. Yeah, I thought it was a bit silly too. But I think we can live with it. - d. ___ foundation-l maili

Re: [Foundation-l] mobile website

2012-01-18 Thread John Vandenberg
the emergency access should be at a different location. mobile users should not be privileged. -- John Vandenberg ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] mobile website

2012-01-18 Thread David Gerard
On 18 January 2012 08:26, John Vandenberg wrote: > Why is the mobile site operational for English Wikipedia? The herd of cats wanted it that way. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Action "Provisions for emergency access to the site should be included in the blackout softw

Re: [Foundation-l] mobile website

2012-01-18 Thread Benjamin Chen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Learn_more It says, The Wikipedia community, as part of their request to the Wikimedia Foundation to carry out this protest, asked us to ensure that we make English Wikipedia accessible in some way during an emergency. The English Wikipedia

[Foundation-l] mobile website

2012-01-18 Thread John Vandenberg
Why is the mobile site operational for English Wikipedia? -- John Vandenberg ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l