Actually, this has all been fun, but we've managed to provoke others
into telling us to take this elsewhere and we all got sidetracked.
In the beginning of the thread I was simply commenting on the nit
picking that can occur over the most trivial changes in copyritten
material and how in the re
On 08/17/11 10:33 AM, Robin McCain wrote:
> As for litigation - I don't think anyone was going to actually attempt
> to go into court on this matter. The Book of Mormon was extremely
> controversial and received a lot of adverse publicity - it is one thing
> to claim that you are going to file an a
because they are trying to make some sheded point more concrete.
> It's not concrete in the U.S., you have to show what specific sort of
> actual injury occurred.
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Robin McCain
> To: Wjhonson
> Cc: foundation-l
> Sent: We
s not concrete in the U.S., you have to show what specific sort of actual
> injury occurred.
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Robin McCain
> To: Wjhonson
> Cc: foundation-l
> Sent: Wed, Aug 17, 2011 9:44 am
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] copyright issues
Wed, Aug 17, 2011 9:44 am
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] copyright issues
On 8/17/2011 9:20 AM, Wjhonson wrote:
For plagiarism to "cause injury" you have to specify the type of injury in your
suit.
And then the case is not about laws about plagiarism per se, of which there are
none, but l
On 8/17/2011 9:20 AM, Wjhonson wrote:
> For plagiarism to "cause injury" you have to specify the type of
> injury in your suit.
> And then the case is not about laws about plagiarism per se, of which
> there are none, but laws about the type of injury you are claiming.
> For example unfair trade
For plagiarism to "cause injury" you have to specify the type of injury in your
suit.
And then the case is not about laws about plagiarism per se, of which there are
none, but laws about the type of injury you are claiming.
For example unfair trade as in "I made all these designs and posted the
g/wiki/Plagiarism mentions copyright infringement
as a related issue to plagiarism...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Robin McCain
> To: foundation-l
> Sent: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 7:43 pm
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] copyright issues
>
> On 8/16/2011 2:50 PM, Wjhonson wr
Litigation under the rules of plagiarism
Can you cite that law for me?
-Original Message-
From: Robin McCain
To: foundation-l
Sent: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 7:43 pm
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] copyright issues
On 8/16/2011 2:50 PM, Wjhonson wrote:
> The year of publicat
igation was considered.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Robin McCain
> To: foundation-l
> Sent: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 2:36 pm
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] copyright issues
>
> On 8/16/2011 12:51 PM,wjhon...@aol.com <mailto:wjhon...@aol.com> wrote:
> >
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] copyright issues
On 8/16/2011 12:51 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
I don't believe your claim that you can take something which is PD, make an
xact image of it, slap it up in a new work of your own (enjoying copyright
rotection automatically) and then claim copyright
On 8/16/2011 12:51 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
> I don't believe your claim that you can take something which is PD, make an
> exact image of it, slap it up in a new work of your own (enjoying copyright
> protection automatically) and then claim copyright over that PD image in your
> work.
>
> C
12 matches
Mail list logo
