On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Peter Damian
wrote:
> If you ask why, I reply that no method has yet been devised
> to give attribution to the author of a work in a way that advances
> their career. I will earn little or no money from either work, I
> imagine. Note that Andrew Lih's book, which
> What license(s) will the book be released under?
> MZMcBride
Very funny :)
I have just completed my book on Scotus, which will be submitted to
the Catholic University Assocation Press next week. Assuming it gets
through their lengthy approval process,it will be published under
whatever lic
>>You know it would in most cases have been considered an act of good
faith to mention your long standing antipathy to wikipedia. But
perhaps I'm just old fashioned.
<<
I'm sorry about that - I assumed everyone knew who 'Peter Damian' was.
I don't understand what you mean about 'antipathy to Wikip
I'm assuming that this is the Peter Damian who is also
knol.google.com/k/edward-buckner/edward-buckner/2u2a5qlvdgh8h/1#
since he signs as "Edward", rather than a troll seeking to impersonate the
banned Wikipedia editor of the same name, for nefarious purposes. In either
case, I have little conf
- Original Message -
From: "geni"
On 23 October 2011 09:16, Peter Damian wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am writing a book on the history of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia
> movement, focusing on its 'history of ideas'. Would any Wikipedians be
> prepared to be interviewed for this? Obviously
On 23 October 2011 09:16, Peter Damian wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am writing a book on the history of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement,
> focusing on its 'history of ideas'. Would any Wikipedians be prepared to be
> interviewed for this? Obviously long-standing Wikipedians would be a focus
Peter Damian wrote:
> I am writing a book on the history of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement,
> focusing on its 'history of ideas'. Would any Wikipedians be prepared to be
> interviewed for this? Obviously long-standing Wikipedians would be a focus
> but I am interested in anyone who is invol
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Peter Damian
wrote:
> A general question: is there a Wikipedian ideology? What is it? In
> particular, how does the current ideology, if there is one, compare with the
> ideology which inspired its founding fathers. And mothers - many of the
> founding editors o
>
> A general question: is there a Wikipedian ideology? What is it?
Hmm. "Ideologie und Utopie." Don't forget about Mannheim ;)
Przykuta
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
On 23 October 2011 09:16, Peter Damian wrote:
> Edward
Is "Edward" Peter Damian, or someone else?
- d.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Greetings,
I am writing a book on the history of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement,
focusing on its 'history of ideas'. Would any Wikipedians be prepared to be
interviewed for this? Obviously long-standing Wikipedians would be a focus but
I am interested in anyone who is involved in the mo
11 matches
Mail list logo
