Re: [Foundation-l] Verifiability, reliable sources, notability and original research

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Patton 123 wrote: > I really think all of these are superflous to each other. Shouldn't they be > merged into one policy, called Wikipedia:Verifiability? I mean, look at what > we're saying here: > > - Wikipedia:Verifiability >

Re: [Foundation-l] Verifiability, reliable sources, notability and original research

oops this was meant for WikiEn-l, sorry ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Verifiability, reliable sources, notability and original research

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Patton 123 wrote: > I really think all of these are superflous to each other. Shouldn't they be > merged into one policy, called Wikipedia:Verifiability? I mean, look at > what > we're saying here: > > - Wikipedia:Verifiability >

[Foundation-l] Verifiability, reliable sources, notability and original research

I really think all of these are superflous to each other. Shouldn't they be merged into one policy, called Wikipedia:Verifiability? I mean, look at what we're saying here: - Wikipedia:Verifiability basically says "content that isn't blatantly obvious sh