On 20 December 2010 22:46, Fred Bauder wrote:
> The network effects are massive. Simply wanting doing something better
> doesn't work. What does work is Wikia wikis such as Lostpedia that will
> draw a small crowd.
Yeah. The small, specialist approach is clearly something that can
produce tiny
> On 20 December 2010 19:47, Noein wrote:
>
>> Is there a general consensus about achieving a monopoly as a good goal.
>> Â Is this part of some public strategy? Is this the position of WMF? Of
>> chapters?
>> I thought I heard some weeks ago on that mail list that diversity is
>> good. That compe
On 20 December 2010 09:35, David Gerard wrote:
> On 20 December 2010 02:31, Noein wrote:
>> On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
>
There can be no viable
>>> alternative to Wikipedia.
>
>> What?
>
>
> This is a perennial thread on wikien-l. There's basically no way at
> this stage for som
On 20 December 2010 19:47, Noein wrote:
> Is there a general consensus about achieving a monopoly as a good goal.
> Is this part of some public strategy? Is this the position of WMF? Of
> chapters?
> I thought I heard some weeks ago on that mail list that diversity is
> good. That competitors ar
On 20/12/2010 15:31, David Gerard wrote:
> On 20 December 2010 17:15, MZMcBride wrote:
>> Marc Riddell wrote:
> On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
>
There can be no viable alternative to Wikipedia.
>
>>> This is the type of thinking that sets you up to being blindsided.
>
>> In th
On 20 December 2010 17:15, MZMcBride wrote:
> Marc Riddell wrote:
On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
>>> There can be no viable alternative to Wikipedia.
>> This is the type of thinking that sets you up to being blindsided.
> In this case, that sounds like a feature, not a bug.
Spec
Marc Riddell wrote:
>>> On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
>> There can be no viable alternative to Wikipedia.
>
> This is the type of thinking that sets you up to being blindsided.
In this case, that sounds like a feature, not a bug.
MZMcBride
>> On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
>
> There can be no viable alternative to Wikipedia.
>
This is the type of thinking that sets you up to being blindsided.
Marc Riddell
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscr
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:35, David Gerard wrote:
> (Any cases I've missed there?)
The madmen. Or is that overlaying both? :)
g
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/
On 20 December 2010 02:31, Noein wrote:
> On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
>>> There can be no viable
>> alternative to Wikipedia.
> What?
This is a perennial thread on wikien-l. There's basically no way at
this stage for someone to be a better Wikipedia than Wikipedia. So
anyone else w
On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
>> There can be no viable
> alternative to Wikipedia.
>
> Fred
>
> User:Fred Bauder
What?
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
> Fred Bauder wrote:
>> http://knowino.org/wiki/Welcome!
>
> Anything particularly notable about this site? It looks like another drop
> in
> the sea of Wikipedia clones.
>
> MZMcBride
>
That one is an actual wiki. We talked about it. I'm just updating.
Network effects should take care of it. Ther
On 20 December 2010 01:24, MZMcBride wrote:
> Fred Bauder wrote:
>> http://knowino.org/wiki/Welcome!
> Anything particularly notable about this site? It looks like another drop in
> the sea of Wikipedia clones.
Not vastly, except that it's actually a fork from Citizendium rather
than Wikipedia
Fred Bauder wrote:
> http://knowino.org/wiki/Welcome!
Anything particularly notable about this site? It looks like another drop in
the sea of Wikipedia clones.
MZMcBride
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: http
http://knowino.org/wiki/Welcome!
Fred
User:Fred Bauder
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
15 matches
Mail list logo