media Foundation Mailing List
Subject: [Foundation-l] : Strategy wiki logo
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hello all,
I feel the logo should be voted on as I am unsure if Meta logo is
appropriate for the wiki. I do not believe this was discussed before. I
have posted a vote for
2012 20:03:17 +0100
From: ??
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Subject: [Foundation-l] : Strategy wiki logo
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hello all,
I feel the logo should be voted on as I am unsure if Meta logo is
appropriate for the wiki. I do not believe thi
Hello all,
I feel the logo should be voted on as I am unsure if Meta logo is
appropriate for the wiki. I do not believe this was discussed before. I
have posted a vote for a new strategy wiki logo (including the current logo
if people want to keep things as is). All logos excluding the current
ver
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 2:34 AM, WereSpielChequers
wrote:
> project within meta. In fact if we are serious about the
> simplification agenda then migrating the contents of Strategy to meta
> would be a logical step to take, perhaps also with a rename to "new
> ideas" as that was what it effectiv
About liquid threads. It all depends on which Wikimedia project
you're editing and publishing. If you have been using liquid threads
since August 2010, using them now is like a walk in the park.
Aversion to change is, however, a serious question and there's always
a price to pay when it is mish
I'm not convinced that the need to retype your password was the only
or even the main reason why Strategy had relatively few participants
from the community.
Using Strategy as a testbed for liquid threads was also a contributory
factor, I'm sure I wasn't the only person who had problems with that
