[Foundation-l] Page views

Fortunately inflated page view counts could still be patched from available log files. http://infodisiac.com/blog/2010/11/page-views-anomaly-in-october-resolved/ Erik Zachte ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe:

Re: [Foundation-l] Page views

The CentralNotice pages/js use client-side caching, so not ever page view will actually spawn a new request to the squid servers. Ryan Kaldari On 10/22/10 4:00 PM, Michael Peel wrote: > On 22 Oct 2010, at 02:02, Erik Zachte wrote: > > >> A quick update on our inflated page view stats: >> >>

Re: [Foundation-l] Page views

On 22 Oct 2010, at 02:02, Erik Zachte wrote: > A quick update on our inflated page view stats: > > Ryan's hypothesis that deployment of the new CentralNotice banner > loader had something to do with it has been confirmed. > > So those extra page views were actually internally generated reques

[Foundation-l] Page views

A quick update on our inflated page view stats: Ryan's hypothesis that deployment of the new CentralNotice banner loader had something to do with it has been confirmed. So those extra page views were actually internally generated requests, which accessed just two new special pages in huge amoun

Re: [Foundation-l] Page views

This may be related to the deployment of the new CentralNotice banner loader. An RT ticket has been opened to investigate. If so, we may need to filter those requests from the page view stats. Ryan Kaldari On 10/18/10 6:16 PM, Erik Zachte wrote: > For those of you who want to follow this closel

[Foundation-l] Page views

Oops, again with shortened url’s, and text only format For those of you who want to follow this closely: The following two charts show daily page views as counted by our squid log post-processing server. Same data, with different time scales,  one of 13, one for 34 months. http://tinyurl.com/2w9

[Foundation-l] Page views

For those of you who want to follow this closely: The following two charts show daily page views as counted by our squid log post-processing server. Same data, with different time scales, one of 13, one for 34 months.

Re: [Foundation-l] Page views

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Joan Goma wrote: > Is there any explanation for the extraordinary jump in page views this > month? > > http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm Hi Joan, We're currently investigating. We'll update here as more info becomes available: https://bugz

Re: [Foundation-l] Page views

On 18 October 2010 20:05, Mathias Schindler wrote: >> If it is not a bug[1], I think it is newsworthy > > What was the day again when Google switched on the "Instant" feature? Google Instant began to be rolled out on 8 September, and I think was broadly "arrived" for most users by a week or so l

Re: [Foundation-l] Page views

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Przykuta wrote: >> Is there any explanation for the extraordinary jump in page views this >> month? >> >> http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm >> > > If it is not a bug[1], I think it is newsworthy What was the day again when Google switched o

Re: [Foundation-l] Page views

press note even if we are sure we have beaten the record. > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:29:15 +0200 > From: "Erik Zachte" > Subject: [Foundation-l] Page views > To: > Message-ID: <001e01cb6e4a$bc2a86d0$347f94...@com> > Content-Type: text/plain

[Foundation-l] Page views

I also think the seemingly extraordinary increase in page views in October is most likely a glitch. Compare this chart which shows long term trends in page (and image) requests per second. http://www.nedworks.org/~mark/reqstats/reqs

Re: [Foundation-l] Page views

Given that there doesn't appear to be any jump in page views or reach as measured by Alexa [1], I would be inclined to assume it is some sort of a glitch with our counting infrastructure. It is hard to imagine any simple external process creating a real 50% jump in traffic. If I recall correctly,

Re: [Foundation-l] Page views

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 22:49, Przykuta wrote: >> Is there any explanation for the extraordinary jump in page views this >> month? >> >> http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm >> > > If it is not a bug[1], I think it is newsworthy > > http://pl.wikinews.org/wiki/W_pa%C5%BAdzierni

Re: [Foundation-l] Page views

> Is there any explanation for the extraordinary jump in page views this > month? > > http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm > If it is not a bug[1], I think it is newsworthy http://pl.wikinews.org/wiki/W_pa%C5%BAdzierniku_skokowo_wzros%C5%82a_liczba_wej%C5%9B%C4%87_na_Wikiped

[Foundation-l] Page views

Is there any explanation for the extraordinary jump in page views this month? http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinf