Hi,
I noticed it through the Wikimedia server log and keep an interest how
it goes. Already one month passed ... could you please give us a
review and report, even as interim?
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:51 AM, GoEthe.wiki wrote:
> Hi.
>
> At ptwiki, we recently implemented a usergroup to help wit
>
> In the ptwiki case, members of the group eliminate the page themselves.
>
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:26:39 +0200, "Federico Leva (Nemo)"
wrote:
> Yaroslav M. Blanter, 25/08/2010 18:19:
>> A similar group has been active in Russian Wikipedia for about a year
>> (only deletion reviews, no speedy deletions). It has been generally
>> regarded as a success.
>
> They used botsa
Yaroslav M. Blanter, 25/08/2010 18:19:
> A similar group has been active in Russian Wikipedia for about a year
> (only deletion reviews, no speedy deletions). It has been generally
> regarded as a success.
They used botsa to delete articles, didn't they? At least this is what I
understood at Wiki
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:51:42 +0200, "GoEthe.wiki"
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> At ptwiki, we recently implemented a usergroup to help with the backlog
of
> requests for speedy deletions, articles for deletion, and others (see
> http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Eliminadores). This was done to
try
> to
Hi.
At ptwiki, we recently implemented a usergroup to help with the backlog of
requests for speedy deletions, articles for deletion, and others (see
http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Eliminadores). This was done to try
to dismistify the admin role, and increase community participation in admi
